THE DANISH INGOLF- EXPEDITION. VOLUME II. 2. ON THE APPENDICES GENITALES IN THE GREENLAND SHARK, SOMNIOSUS MICROCEPHALUS (RL. SCHN.), AND OTHER SELACHIANS. BY HECTOR F. E. JUNGERSEN. WITH 6 PLATES AND 2S FIGURES IN THE TEXT. TRANSLATED BY TORBEN LUNDBECK. ->4*:x*<- COPENHAGEN. BIANCO LUNO (F. DREYER), PRINTER TO THE COURT. 1899. CONTENTS. On the Appendices Qenitales in the Greenland Shark, Somniosus Microcephalia (Bl. Schn.)> and other Selachians. Page Introductory remarks I. I. The appendages of the Ventrals in the Greenland Shark I, II. The ventral appendages in other Selachians 17 1. A general view of the Copulatory appendages in the Selachians 17 2. Special part 27 Selachoidei 27 Spinacidae: Acanthias vulgaris Risso 27 Spinax niger Bonap 29 Scyumus lichia Bonap 31 Scylliidse: ScyUiutn canicula (L.) 32 — Scyllium stellare (L.) 34 — Pristiurus melanostomus (Bonap.) ... 36 Lamnidae: Lamna cornubica (Gmelin) 37 Selachus maximus (Gunnerus) 39 Rhinidae: Rhina squatina (L.) 41 Cestraciontidae : Heterodontus (Cestracion) Phillipi (Cuv.) 45 Notidanidae: Chlamydoselachus anguineus Garman 45 Page Carchariidae: Mustelus antarcticus Gthr 46. Batoidei 47 Torpedinidae : Torpedo marniorata Risso 47 — Torpedo oculata Belon 50 Narcine sp 50. Rhinobatidae : Rhinobatus columns: Bonap 52 Trygonidae: Trygon violacea Bonap 53 Rajidae 55 — Raja batds L 56 — Raja nidarosiensis Collett 59, Raja clavata L 59 — Raja radiata Donovan 63 — Raja fyllas Ltk 66. — Raja circularis Couch 67 Holocephala 6S Chimaera monstrosa L 69 Callorhynchus antarcticus (Lacep.) 74. 3. Which is the function of the appendices genitales? 77 Addenda S2 Explanation of the Plates S4 419-.' On the Appendices Genitales (CJaspers) in the Greenland Shark, Somniosus microcephalus (Bl. Schn.), and other Selachians. By Hector F. E. Jungersen. The following treatise has its origin from the circumstance that during the stay at Iceland of the cruiser Ingolf I endeavoured to gather informations as to several facts concerning the Green- land Shark, not vet elucidated. I succeeded only in throwing light upon a single one of these obscure facts bv gathering a suitable material. At the subsequent examination of this material I soon perceived that the appendices genitales or claspers of the Selachians generally had hitherto been very imperfectly examined although these organs on account of their conspicuous - - sometimes almost colossal - dimensions have from time immemorial been known as characteristic for the males of cartilaginous fishes. Of their functions only little is known with certainty, and on this- point I am not able to bring new facts of any importance; but though the function must be supposed to be the same in all Sela- chians, a rich variation is found in their structure, especially in the skeleton, the structure being different from genus to genus or even from species to species. That, however, through all this variation a common type may be shown to exist, also with respect to the skeleton and the muscles, has not hitherto been seen, but will, I hope, with sufficient clearness be shown by the following trea- tise. As a consequence of the way, in which the work has come into existence, I have divided it into two parts, of which one deals with the Greenland Shark only, while the other treats of other Plagiostomes and Holocephales. I. The Appendages of the Ventrals in the Greenland Shark. The words with which Gunnerus 1 ) commences his treatise of the Greenland Shark: This fish of the Haaekiud deserves to be somewhat better known to the learned than hitherto it has been may be said to some extent to be in force to this day, our knowledge of this species of sharks being still rather defective, although it is not only very frequently found in the northern seas, but is also in several places the object of a large and regular fishery, as in our northern dependencies, espe- cially off the coast of Iceland. It is so far less extraordinary, that many things with regard to ') Om Haa-Skierdingen. Det Throndhiemske Selskabs Skrifter. 2, 1763, p. 330. The Tngolf-Expedilion. II. 2. ! ON THE APPENDICES GENITALES (CLASPERS) IN THE GREENLAND SHARK. its biological conditions are unknown, as the same thing may be said of many common species of fishes on onr own coasts ; but it seems more remarkable that we do not even know for certain whether the Greenland Shark is viviparous or oviparous, and that several features of the anatomical structure of the animal are unknown or only deficiently known. Although this species of Sharks is rather frequently found on the more populated European coasts — also on ours -- and more than once has come into the hands of naturalists, even anatomists, we are thus far from being perfectly acquainted with the structure of its urinary and reproductive organs. The facts which have in later years been brought forth as to the latter — and upon the whole concerning the «viscera» of the Greenland Shark -- are due to Sir William Turner, who has exa- mined several specimens from British coasts and has given his results in The Journal of Anatomy and Physiology : ). As to the female the first of these communications (i) showed the surprising result that oviducts were wanting. Consequently the Greenland Shark would necessarily be oviparous, and the ova, detached from the ovary, would presumably leave the abdominal cavity through the abdominal pores to be impregnated outside the mother. That the ovaries were immature in both the examined animals of a respective length of n ft. 8 inches and 8 I / 2 ft. is however evident from the description. Later (3) the first statement is corrected: oviducts 2 ) are found, opening as usual in the Sharks witli wide, funnelshaped, closely united mouths before the liver, and running along the lower side of the kidneys to the cloaca; in the examined specimen of 7 feet length they were about as thick as a goosequill; the ovaries were quite immature. Still later (4) these parts are described in a somewhat more deve- loped state in a Greenland Shark n ft. 6 in. long; the diameter of the oviduct was only 3/8 inch (about 1 ctm.); the ovaries were quite immature. In none of these communications is shown, whether any shell gland , any indication of an uterus, indications of folds of the mucous membrane or the like were found. To judge from the fact of these structures not being mentioned, that nothing of the kind is found, I do not think justifiable; a shell- gland for inst. is generally always found in Sharks, whether they be oviparous or viviparous; more probably these structures on account of the immature state of the animals have not been prominent, and therefore have not been noticed. For that all the females examined by Sir W. Turner have been immature and young animals admits, I think, of no doubt. The fact is that we know to a certainty that the mature ovarial eggs are about as large as goose-eggs, but the largest mentioned by Sir W. Turner were only of the size of shot or at most of small bullets, and we know that the Greenland Shark grows to a still more considerable size than 11 ft. 8 in.; therefore if the oviducts showed so small a size and besides (presumably) so simple a shape, it is only, what might be expected in younger individuals 3) , and I see no reason at all to A Contribution to the Visceral Anatomy of the Greenland Shark iLtemargus borealis). L. c. 7. 1S73, p. 233. 21 Additional observations on the Anatomy of the Greenl. Shark. L. c. 3, 1874, p. 285. 3) Note on the Oviducts of the Greenl. Shark. I,, c. 12, 1878, p. 604. 4) Additional Note on the Oviducts etc. L. c. 19, 1S85, p. 221. -• The oviducts had already been seen in 1S47 by Kneeland I Boston Journ. Nat. Hist. 5, p. 479, 485) in a specimen of the length of 7 ft. 5 in.; the ovaries were immature. The first statement by Sir W.Turner has been repeated by Furbringer: Zur vergl. Anat. u. Entwickelungsgesch. der Excretiousorgane der Vertebrateu iMorphol. Jahrb. 4, 1878] p. 53, 83; it is found as late as in Guido Schneider: Ueber die Entw. der Genitalcanale bei Col/itis ttznia h- und Phoxinus Imvis Ag. 1. Mem. Ac. Imp. d. Sc. de St. Petersbourg |8J T. 2, 1S951 p. 9. i) Comp. J oh. Mfiller: Untersuchungen fiber die Eingeweide der Fische, Schluss der vergleichende Anatomie der Myxinoiden (Abhdl. K. Ac. Wiss. Berlin 1843 [1845]], p. 133, 134. ON THE APPENDICES GENITAI.ES (CLASPERS) IN THE GREENLAND SHARK. suppose, as Sir W. Turner 1 ) does, another mode of bringing forth the ova in this than in other Sharks; the ova certainly all get into the oviduct, and are impregnated there; whether they later are laid or develop into embryos in the u terns must for the present be left undecided 2 ). On the internal reproductive organs of the male only one communication (2) has been given, concerning a specimen of the length of 6 ft. i in. The testes were immature; neither by the direct examination of them and their mesorchium nor by injection from the renal duct was Sir W.Turner able to detect any duct for the sperm, and from that he infers that distinct sexual ducts are also wanting in the male, and that the sperm is evacuated into the abdominal cavity, thus cpiite corre- sponding to the case of the females, as it the previous year had been understood with regard to those; but while the statement has been corrected by T. himself with regard to the latter, nothing has as vet come to light concerning the male. I think, however, that the supposition is allowable, that T.'s inference is premature also with regard to the male; it is likely that vasa efferentia in this young, immature specimen (which T. himself declares to be of immature growth ) were either not formed at all or at all events not in a directly visible way 3). It must appear quite natural that also the external male genitals were quite undeveloped in this specimen; the copulatory appendages were only of a length of 1 3/8 inch, and were far from reaching the end of the fin-membrane (see the fig. 1. c. p. 287). But these copulatory appendages seem always to have shown a q trite similar undeve- *) Sir W.Turner evidently lias not been able quite to dismiss his original conception of the evacuation of the ova through the abdominal pores (to which for the rest every parallel would be wanting, as the Cyclostomes have no abdominal pores) ; even in his latest communication (4, 18S5 p. 222) T. says: < But, as it is very doubtful if the entire surface of each ovary could be embraced by the spathe-like canal (i. e. the mouth of the oviduct), a proportion of the ova would probably be shed into the peritoneal cavity, and be evacuated through the abdominal pores . -1 Professor Ltitken in: Smaa Bidrag til Selachiernes Naturhistorie. 2. Om Havkalens Forplantning (Vid. Medd. Naturh. Eoren. i Kbhvn. 1S79— So; p. 56) has tried to make it probable that the Greenland Shark should be oviparous, and moreover have soft, shell-less eggs, which is known in no other plagiostome. Among the reasons that might give some countenance to this notion Sir W. Turn er' s anatomical results are quoted. It is quite evident that if T.'s first communication of the want of oviducts had been correct, a deposition of the eggs, and an impregnation of them outside of the body of the female would have been as good as proved; but the later informations from the same author are in my opinion of such a nature, that thev can be used as proofs neither for nor against a deposition of the eggs, but might — connected with my demonstration in the following, that the male Greenland Shark has fully developed copulatory organs — be used as proofs of the eggs, as generally in Sharks, being impregnated in the oviduct. The other reasons for a deposition of the eggs, quoted by Professor L-, viz. the negative one that we have never hitherto got any foetus of the Greenland Shark, and the more posi- tive accounts from several laymen of numerous large eggs, but always in the females, cannot, I think, prove anything either in one or the other direction. Against the first of these reasons may be quoted the equally negative circumstance that we have never found eggs of the Greenland Shark outside the animal neither, and against the second that the large eggs are evidently ovarial eggs still coherent by the thin, distended ovarial stroma; for all informations — also those I have got persouallv from an Icelandic Shark-fisher — state that the large eggs, which are only seen by the flensing, always cohere by thin membranes or the like; but large and soft ovarial eggs, as is well known, are not only found in oviparous, but as well in viviparous Sharks and Ravs. As however the only earlier authors, who state anything at all about the propagation, declare quite positively, that the Greenland Shark is viviparous, viz. besides Otto Fabricius and Faber, who are both cited by Professor Eiitken, also David Cranz, who says in his Historie vou Gronland . 2. Anil. 1770 p. 138: Er bringt gemeinig- lich 4 Junge zugleich zur Welt (from this work the statement is adopted by Couch, from whom Gunther probably has his remark: It is stated to be viviparous, and to produce about four young at a birth [Introd. to the study of Fishes, [880 P- 3331 1 — aI1(1 - as moreover the verv nearest relative of the Greenland Shark, the Son/nioits rosiratus of the Mediterranean, is known quite certainly to be viviparous, as also the somewhat more distant relatives, the Scymnus- species and the other Spinaa'da , I, to be sure, think it most probable — I feel tempted to use a stronger expression — that also the Greenland Shark, the other Somu/osas-s-pecies, must be viviparous. i.ccording to Semper: Das Urogenitalsystem der Plagiostomen etc. (Arb. Zool. Zoot. Inst. Wiirzburg, 2, 1875) vasa efferentia are in several Sharks already formed in the embryo; but I think it is doubtful whether they can be recognized here without the assistance of the microscope, and it does not appear that Sir W.Turner has used a microscopical examination; but he says that the mesorchium was so transparent that he must have seen a duct, if there had been one. The part of the testis itself, which T. especially examined to trace a possible duct in it, can scarcely contain such a one, as it is evidently the Vorkeimfalte of Semper, i.e. the part where the new ampullae are formed. ON THE APPENDICES GENITAEES (CLASPERS) IN THE GREENLAND SHARK. loped condition in the other (and it turns out to be very few) male specimens, mentioned as examined by naturalists. In this circumstance, in connection with the interpretations by Sir W. Turner of the genital appa- ratus in both sexes, is most likely to be sought the reason of the idea that the Greenland Shark only should be possessed of rudimentary copulatory appendages. This supposition has been set forth by Professor Liitken in the communication on the propagation of the Greenland Shark, cited on p. 3 note 2. In this paper Sir W. Turner's description of the reproductory organs both of the male and female is reported with the following remark: < Of what use the copulatory members of the male were was not evident; but perhaps these organs are in this species of Sharks rudimentary structures without any importance? At all events I know no descriptions giving them a size like that found in the Spiny Dog-fish or the Basking Shark . I must confirm the latter sentence myself. It was to be expected beforehand that, if the male of this species had really copulatory appendages of proportions relatively as those of other species, so prominent formations would scarcely have escaped the notice, but would probably have been mentioned by one or more of the many earlier authors, who have written of the North and the Northern nature, in which writings the Greenland Shark and the catching of it bear a part, and of whom more, I suppose, have had the opportunity of knowing the animal by autopsy. However, I have in vain sought in authors as: Egede, Cranz, O. Fabricius, Scoresby, Eggert Olafsen, Mohr, Olaus Olavius, Faber, Pontoppidan, Strom, Leem, Rosted, Landt, and others; I find nothing concerning this point. Only Gunner us 1 ) mentions these organs, which we have reason to take to be the external characteristics of the male , but in undeveloped condition. Gunnerus had 3 male specimens, the largest not exceeding 5 ells (Danish) in length, and the smallest being 2 s j 2 ell; the figure shows the appendages quite small, shorter than the fin- membrane; besides it is evident from his description, that he himself justly thinks his specimens to be young animals. Later authors too do not mention appendages in more developed condition; they are on the whole (as far as I know) only mentioned by Yarrell and by Malm. Yarrell 2 ) says of a specimen described by Valenciennes 5 ): The fish was a male; the ventral fins and sexual appendages or claspers very small . Valenciennes himself, however, says nothing of the sex, and does not at all mention the appendages; he only says that the ventrals are small, so that possibly the cited remark of Yarrell has it origin from a misreading. Malm n mentions two males, which he correctly declares to be young, respectively of a length of i850 mm and i88o mm ; the length of the hjelpgenitalia» was in both 25 mm ; they did not reach the end of the ventral fin. Only in one place I have found a statement suggesting, that the authors in question have had the opportunity of seeing the appendages of the Greenland Shark in a more developed state, viz. in M tiller and Heule s ). They divide the genus Si yii/i/ us in two subgenera: 1) Scyiinnis (to which Sc. lichia and .S'. brasiliensis) , characterized among M 1. c. p. 330 seq., pi. X, fig. 1, Lit. a. PL XI, fig. 1, Litt. a, a. 2 ) History of British Fishes, 3J ed., 2, p. 527. 3) Nouv, Ann. du Museum. 1, p. 455, pi. 20. 4) Goteborgs och Bohuslans Fauna. 1S77. p. 627, 629. 5) Systematische Beschreibung der Plaglostomen. 1841. p. 91, 93. ON THE APPENDICES GENITALES (CLASPERS) IN THE GREENLAND SHARK. 5 other things by: Die mannlichen Anhange ohne Stachel , and 2) Lamargus (to which /.. borealis |the Greenland Shark], L. Labor dii and L. rostratus) in which: die Mauucheu liaben einen Stachel an den Anhangen . But whence have M. & H. this latter information? The work itself tells nothing about it, and in none of the works cited is found anything about a spine on the appendage in S. borealis (and no more in the other species). After Professor Liitken having given the cited communication about the propagation of the Greenland Shark the Museum of Copenhagen has got a male specimen of a length of 9 ft. (2835 mm ), whose ventrals are preserved in the collection; also in this specimen the copulatory appendages are verv small as hereafter mentioned, and so far they might serve as a corroboration of the advanced con- jecture, that in this Shark these organs should be rudimentary and functionless. As I, however, had some doubts of the correctness of this supposition --as also of the other that the Greenland Shark should be oviparous -- I endeavoured during the last cruise of the Ingolf-. to get fins of the Greenland Shark for examination, and as far as possible to procure reliable infor- mations of this Shark in all respects. During a stay in the close of June 1896 in Dyrefjord, where a manufactory for train-oil of the Greenland Shark is found, I took the opportunity of communicating with a fisher of Greenland Sharks,* whom I for some time questioned by means of an interpreter. The conversation was rather difficult, as the man was somewhat embarassed, only answered to my questions, and would not speak himself or give his own opinion. However I got the information that the fishermen know very well to distinguish between male and female, that «eggs> (i. e. the large ovarial eggs) are only found in large specimens, and that the males are smaller than the females; he had however never seen a Greenland Shark smaller than about 3 ells (Danish) r ). I drew a sketch of the ventrals for him, and asked, if he had seen the appendages on the ventrals, which he affirmed; then I promised him a reward, if he would obtain for me as many pairs of ventrals as possible, and with as large appendages as possible, which he might preserve in brine, as also a whole and sound male, as I supposed that I should be back in Dyrefjord about at the time, when he should return to deliver his next cargo of liver, this, as is well known, being the only part of the animal made use of. Circumstances however would that the Ingolf did not return on the Dyrefjord until the beginning of August, and so I did not find the man again. But I found at the manufactory a great deal of pairs of ventrals in brine, all with the appendages and with these in different stages of development, together with a whole male, the last the fisherman had caught; he had during the whole time very carefullv kept the last caught male for preservation, and had come on the Dyrefjord with a quite sound specimen, which was also the very smallest he had got; but as I did not return in clue time, also this specimen was put into brine. Apparently everything had kept very well by this mode of preservation, the fins at all events excellently; but by the dissection of the whole Shark it soon became apparent that all the internal organs were sadly damaged: the kidneys and the internal reproductive organs were completely disorganized, so that nothing whatever was to be recognised; not even the renal ducts that use to be rather resistant, were to be traced at all. I was thus disappointed in my ') Collett however states that specimens of a length of about 2 ft. sometimes have been obtained; probably newborn youngs. Meddelelser om Norges Fiske i Aarene 1879—83, p. 118. Nyt Mag. f. Naturv. vol. 29. 6 ON THE APPENDICES GENITALES (CLASPERS) IN THE GREENLAND SHARK. hope of being able to give a good account of the structure of these organs, and must be content to give informations of the external copulatory organs. The whole Shark was about 8 ft. (2 m 50 cm ) in length, and its ventrals, as also their appendages, were smaller than any of the other cut off ventrals and their appendages, which latter were also much more developed; unfortunately no statement of the length of the respective animals was given. But if we start from the supposition, which I think most likely, that the ventral proper grows in pro- portion to the animal itself, we can with some certainty calculate the size of the animals, to which the cut off fins have belonged; and judged by that they have all been large animals between 3 and 5 metres, the largest at all events upwards of 6 ells (Danish). I am not able to decide with perfect certainty, if an}- of the obtained ventrals have the appen- dage so large and developed, as it possibly can be; but at all events these organs are so far developed in the largest specimens that they will scarcely change their structure in any considerable degree, even if they become somewhat longer. In the largest fins the free end of the copulatory organ reaches about 5 cm farther back than the point of the fin-membrane itself; in the somewhat smaller ones 3 — 4 cm , and in two a little smaller still about i cln behind the point of the fin. In the smallest specimen finally (the above mentioned animal 2 m 50 cm long) the' point of the ventral on the contrary reaches 2 — 3 cm farther back than the point of the appendage. Between this last specimen and the immediately preceding the above mentioned specimen of the museum (which however is partly skele- tonized) may be placed with regard to size and development. Here accordingly we have a series showing the stages in the growth of these organs, well known from the other Sharks, from small short rudiments, shorter than the ventral itself, to a more or less considerable length beyond the inner edge of the ventral. Thus every idea of the Greenland Shark differing from other Sharks in only possessing rudimentary ventral appendages must be dropped. About the remaining external features of the organ I shall confine myself to state, that its whole dorsal surface (i. e. the surface which in the natural position is in contact with the ventral side of the body) as well as the adjoining part of the fin itself is quite naked and smooth without dermal teeth, which is also the case with the medial surface, where those of the same pair are in contact, while the ventral surface (as in the remainder of the fin) is clothed with dermal teeth, however more sparsely and sparingly towards the point, the outermost part of which is naked and quite soft. Otherwise these organs are in their developed state stiff and hard 011 account of the strong internal skeleton. On the lateral side of the end is felt through the skin a particularly hard and movable part of the skeleton, and in most of the specimens this part is naked and appears as a pointed, polished thorn or spine. I can however assert with certainty that in all the specimens, I have brought home, it has only been laid bare by the skin on the spot being torn; it is also seen cpiite covered in the right clasper of one of the largest specimens. I suppose, however, that before the member comes into function, or at the function, this spine is uncovered; in fully developed appendages of Acanthias and Spinax at all events both the corresponding part and one or two more pails of the skeleton protrude naked, uncovered by the integument; and in the circumstance that in all these tins the spine surely only has been set free by damage or by bad preservation, I find a positive intimation of their appendages not yet having reached their greatest development. This ON THE APPENDICES GENITALIS (CLASPERS) IN THE GREENLAND SHAKR. spine is still plainly felt in the somewhat smaller fins, excepting the two smallest; in these evidently it has not vet been calcified, no more than most of the other parts of the skeleton, characterizing the end or terminal part of the developed organ; therefore these small appendages are npon the whole rather soft to the feeling and with flexible ends. The form of the developed appendage is straight, somewhat dorso-ventrally flattened ; a distinc- tion may be made between the considerably longer proximal part, which might be called the shaft, and the short distal part, the terminal part, which is free of the fin, and, as will be more parti- cnlarlv bespoken hereafter, possesses a certain limited mobility; the largest breadth is found imme- diately before the terminal part; on the dorsal side, somewhat nearer to the lateral than to the medial edge, is seen the peculiar cleft, the appendix-slit, which is found in all Selachians; it reaches to the posterior end of the member, and leads in the free part of this into a deep canal, more anteriorlv into a glandular bag, which, like a deep pocket, at the base of the appendage goes round to the ventral side of the fin, and here under the skin reaches — according to age and development — a longer or shorter distance towards the pelvis. The inner walls of this bag are smooth, partly pigmented, and from their epithelium is secreted a peculiar fluid, which when coagulated is tallowy, but whose function is not certainly known. This bag, as to its origin, is simply a folding in of the outer skin 1 ); it is surrounded with muscles, able to press the secretion into the canal and through the slit to the exterior. The inner (medial) lip of the slit is immovable and cannot be displaced, while the outer (lateral) one till near the terminal part consists of soft tissue, and is therefore easily opened, so that a finger may be introduced into the bag; but at the end of the shaft, immediately before the terminal part, all distension is prevented by the inner skeleton, which is found here, and straightens the slit, so that it becomes very narrow; to the distal side of this straightening, in the terminal part ifself, the canal may again be opened, and it will open spontaneously, if the terminal part is bent a little in the ventro-medial direction, in which case the spine will at once erect. The following measures referring to the largest appendages, may be added: Length from the anterior border of the cloaca to the terminal point of the appendage 24 — 26 cm . of the terminal part of the appendage 5 — 5'5 cm . Breadth of the appendage before the terminal part 3'3 — 4 cm . Length of the slit i6 cm . of the part outside the fin 6 cm . Part outside of the point of the fin-membrane 5 c,n - The skeleton (pi. I, fig. 1—9). The skeleton of the ventral fin in the male consists of 1) the pelvis, 2) the axial part or the stem, wdiich laterally wears 3) the rays, and as a continuation 4! the skeleton of the appendage. The structure of the pelvis is as commonly in the Sharks, it consisting of an unpaired, some- what arcuated cartilage, the surface of which is rather slightly calcified ; it has the greatest thickness ' I have followed its development in embryos of Acanlhias , as has also been done by Petri: Die Copulations- organe der Plagiostomen. Zeitschr. f. -\viss. Zoologie, vol. 30, 1878. 8 ON THE APPENDICES GENITALES (CLASPERS) IN THE GREENLAND SHARK. in the middle, and here projects from the posterior edge a clumsily rounded process. The stem of the ventral articulates by its principal piece, the basale, (pi. I, fig. i B), with the lateral end of the pelvis, as do also a pair of the foremost rays. The foremost ray (i?) is always short and big, shaped like the blade of an axe, whose head articulates with the pelvis, the hindmost corner of the blade with two small terminal joints; it bears the second ray, which is accordingly out of connec- tion as well with the stem as with the pelvis; sometimes it is proximally coalesced with H. The third ray has pressed so far forward, that it articulates both with the stem and the pelvis. Most of the other rays are more or less straight, cylindric, distally a little flattened (especially in the foremost ones); the two (less frequently three) hindmost are always somewhat bent, so that the convexity turns dorsally, owing to the fact, that the glandular bag from the dorsal side passes under them to the ventral side of the fin. These two hindmost rays are often more or less united, sometimes almost quite coalesced. The foremost rays (more than half of them) have three joints, then follow some (3) with two joints, and the last (3) are never jointed. The number of rays varies from 12 — 16 1 )\ com- monly one fin of the same pair has a ray more than the other, and a rather considerable variation is found in the more special relations of the rays, in their mutual coalescing 2 ), their articulation, and distal dichotomy; sometimes an extra ray is inserted, not reaching the stem; such extra rays have not been counted in the numbers given , and they do not occur symmetricallv in both fins. Such variations are also known in other Sharks 3) , and I shall not here enter into further details , as they are of no importance for the examination in question. The stem consists of 1) a large and big principal piece, Basale nictapterygii (/>'), to which most of the rays are attached; its inner edge is almost straight, only slightly concave, the outer edge is convex; 2) a short piece (b 2 ) directly continuing the foregoing; 3) generally is on the medial side inserted, as it were intercalated, a little cuneiform piece (b T ). The piece b 2 bears the two hindermost rays, so that the last but one is articulated at its proximal extremity, and here also touches the ba- sale, the last at its distal extremity, where it has also a little articular surface with the proximal end of the stem of the appendage. Finally is found 4) a rather considerable piece (/J) placed on the dorsal side of the stem in such a way, that it is proximally connected with the latero-dorsal corner of the basale by a little articular surface, and distally by a longer, obliquely placed articular surface with the latero-dorsal edge of the anterior end of the appendix-stem (fig. 2 at x). This piece /? is rather thick, dorso-ventrally somewhat flattened, has a convex medial edge, and a straight lateral edge; posteriorly it is somewhat more pointed than anteriorly; the foremost part of the convex edge is connected with the dorsal side of the piece b, ; it has no articulation at all with any of the rays-*). Between the lateral corner of b 2 , /?, and the appendixstem 5) a little piece £ 3 is sometimes intercalated. Then follows 6) the appendixskel eton. Its chief piece (tab. I, fig. lb, fig. 2, 3) evi- dently belongs to the stem, and is placed in immediate continuation of the foregoing pieces, with ) In two females I have found the number respectively 15—17 and 16—17 on the two sides. I In one specimen separate, independent pieces of cartilage have been developed; they are placed across, and near the outer end of the rays they connect two and two of these. 1 Comp. Gegenbaur: Ueber das Skelet der Glieduiaassen der Wirbelthiere im Allgemeinen und der HintergHed- maassen der Selachier insbesondere. Jen. Zeitschr. 5 Bd., 1870, p. 435 seq. 1 l'.\ the choice of the letter-marks I have intended to point out, that all these parts belong to the stem-skeleton. ON THE APPENDICES GENITALES (CDASPERS) IN THE GREENLAND .SHARK. g which it forms an — to be sure very obtuse — angle. In a fully developed skeleton the chief piece is loneer than the b a sale; in the largest specimens at hand the ratio is: — = c. — ; on the medial side it is rounded, in the foremost third part somewhat dorso-ventrally flattened; the 'lateral sur- face (/) is more or less distinctly bounded from the other surfaces; it is only in the fore part somewhat rounded, posteriorly it is flattened, and the hindmost part is somewhat hollow; on the dorsal side this lateral surface is in the whole length of the piece sharply limited by a thin, elevated, hard calcified ridge (fig. 2, 3, AV), anteriorly beginning as quite low, posteriori} - becoming higher and higher, as well as thicker, and bearing in the posterior half an edge, folded to the dorsal side, (irregularly indented, and collarlike; 011 the ventral side (see fig. 3) the lateral surface is in the greater part of its extent much more indistinctly bounded by an evenly rounded eminence, which is not harder than the common stirface; in the posterior part, however, rises rather suddenly a short, calcified, strong ridge or plate, which in the shape of a large foliaceous process folds over to the dorsal side, where it approaches rather near to the opposite edge (fig. 2, 3, Rv). The free edge of this folded process is thickened, and irregularly rugged. The described elevated ridges or plates in connection with the flatly hollowed hindmost part of the lateral surface forms the place of part of the appendix-slit or the excretory duct of the gland-bag; these hard parts of the skeleton it is, that, as mentioned on p. 7, prevent a distension of the appendix-slit. Immediately behind the end of these calcified ridges the chief piece continues as a thin, round, finger-shaped elongation, the end-style (fig. 1, 2, 3, g); it is soft, or at all events at its base quite devoid of calcification, while farther out a slight surface-calcification may be found. Else the chief piece is everywhere calcified on the surface (being anteriorly somewhat rough for the attachment of the muscles), and more calcified than the basale and the rays, but the above mentioned ridges (AV, Rv) are completely calcified and hard. When such a chief piece is dried, these ridges therefore will not shrink, but rise distinctly as independent parts. By a close examination of an undried chief piece the boundary Hues of these calcified side-parts may also be distinguished, and thus we shall arrive at the same result: the chief piece is composed of three parts, viz. the appendix-stem {b), posteriorly becoming lanceolate, medio-laterally compressed, and ending as a slender, thin, (at the base) uncalcified end-style, and two calcified marginal cartilages, one long, slender, dorsal, the other shorter, broader, ventral (AV, Rv). To this chief piece are attached a number of terminal pieces, more or less movably joined to each other and to the chief piece. Of these pieces two join the posterior borders of the marginal car- tilages and the end-style of the stem, and form, as a kind of continuation of the marginal cartilages, the dorsal (dorso-medial), and ventral (ventro-lateral) borders of the hinder part of the appendix-slit; these two pieces are here called respectively the dorsal and the ventral terminal piece (Td, To). The dorsal piece (fig. 1 Td, fig. 4, 5) is the smaller one; it tapers to both ends, most to the post- erior; on the exterior (medially) it is somewhat rounded, with a sharp lateral edge, a little denticulated, towards the appendix-slit slightly hollow in the foremost two third parts; the thick medial edge is by means of connective tissue closely connected with the end-style, the anterior end with the dorsal marginal cartilage. It is completely calcified, and the surface, especially towards the terminal end, is rugged and rough. The Ingolf-Expedition. II. 2. 2 IO ON THE APPENDICES GENITALES (CLASPERS) IN THE GREENLAND SHARK. The ventral terminal piece (fig. i Tv, fig. 6, 7) is considerably larger; the surface towards the appendix-slit is deeply hollow like a trough, the external, ventral, surface is rounded, and has laterally a winglike, sharp process; it is also completely calcified, and a great part of the surface is irregularly furrowed and rugged. The one anterior edge of the trough articulates with the ventral marginal cartilage, by the inner, ventral, edge it is connected with the style. Between this piece and the overlapping plate of the ventral marginal cartilage is seen a third terminal piece (fig. 1, 7",), the thorn or spine (fig. 8, 9). It is, like the other pieces, quite hard, and the proximal end is somewhat head-shaped with a smooth surface, almost like an articular surface; else it is for a great part very irregularly rugged and furrowed, but the outermost point is glossv and smooth, dentine-like; the whole thorn is longitudinally somewhat twisted. Besides these fully developed terminal pieces indications of two more are to be seen, viz. a thin, narrow lamella, only calcified in spots, joins the lateral edge of Td, and supports the edge of the dorsal lip of the appendix-slit; anteriorly it reaches somewhat beyond Td; this indicated piece is here designated as Td z (comp. pi. Y, fig. 61, 62); the second piece is a very firm and strong fibrous tissue, joined to the anterior dorsal edge of the piece Tv, and without distinct borders merging into the aponeurotic covering, connecting the thorn, the piece Tv, and the overlapping plate of the mar- ginal cartilage, and serving for insertion of part of the muscles (see pi. V, fig. 61, 62, Tv z ); in this latter piece a calcification has commenced, indicating perhaps, that it might become a separate termi- nal piece, which I shall designate as Tv, (comp. other Plagiostomes for iust. Spinax). As these two last mentioned pieces are, as it were, still developing, I suppose, that even the most developed of the appendices in hand cannot, in a stricter sense, be said to be full grown yet; but as the piece Tv 2 also in some other Sharks (f. inst. Acanthias) is found only indicated and uncalcified, even in quite deve- loped appendices, my supposition is not quite reliable. The whole of this terminal skeleton, composed of the terminal pieces and the end-style of the stem, is movable to a certain degree; as to further details on this point the reader is referred to p. 14. By examining the appendix-skeleton in the earliest stages of development we find that originally it is composed of only one single piece, being that, which above is termed the appendix- stem. This 1 in the specimen from Iceland, 2 m 50 cm long, and in the specimen from the Zoological Museum, 9 ft. long) is still quite soft, shorter than the basale, anteriorly rounded, posteriorly lance- olate, the edges of the lancet being placed almost dorsally and ventrally , and ends as a thin style (see fig. 2 in the text p. 19); thus mainly rendering the form of the chief piece minus the marginal cartilages. Of these latter as well as of the terminal pieces no trace is found. In somewhat more advanced stages, where the appendix-stem is as long as, or a little longer than the basale, the three terminal pieces and especially the thorn are very well to be distinguished, while the marginal cartilages still are absent, or, at all events, in the fibrous tissues, occupying their place, no calcification or distinct bordering of such cartilages is to be found (not even of the overlapping plate). In still a little mure advanced stages also the marginal cartilages are found in the same shape and with the same bordering as in the most developed, but the boundary lines between them and the stem are much more distinctly marked; they are calcified, but are still soft enough to permit of easy cutting; on THE APPENDICES GENITALES (CLASPERS) IN THE GREENLAND SHARK. I( to the naked eve the section shows a particular fibrous texture (as in sections of the terminal pieces), and a whitish colour, distinguishing it distinctly from a section of the appendix-stem or any other part of the skeleton proper, for inst. a ray or the basale, the surface of which will be hyaline. From these developmental facts it will appear with all desirable distinctness, that the marginal carti- lages and the terminal pieces are secondary parts of the skeleton, developed in the tissues surrounding the primary skeleton, properly so called. Tims of the appendix-skeleton only the appendix-stem, the piece b, belongs to the primary skeleton. To resume what is said about the appendix-skeleton in the Greenland Shark: The appendix-skeleton consists of a chief piece and terminal pieces movably connected with it; the chief piece is formed by the coalescing of the appendix-stem with two secondary calcified cartilages, the marginal cartilages; the appendix-stem belongs to the primordial axial skeleton of the ventral fin, being the terminal joint the extremity of which remains soft; the terminal pieces are all secondary calcified cartilages. The muscular system (pi. V, fig. 58 to 62) follows the type, which has been described in Acanthias by v. Davidoff 1 ); this type, however, has been founded on the structure of the ventrals of the female; the rather considerable differences from it are due to the copulatory appendages, for the special use of which special muscles have to be developed. Distinction may be made between: I) The fin muscles proper, and II) the muscles of the appendage; as, however, some of the former spread over part of the appendage, this distinction cannot be made quite distinct. I. In the fin -muscles proper may be distinguished, as v. Davidoff and the earlier arithors do, between the muscles of the ventral and those of the dorsal side; they are anta- gonistic, the former adducting the fin, and removing it from the abdomen, the latter abducting the fin, and pressing it against the abdomen. 1) The ventral muscles of the fin consist of a) a medial muscular mass, chiefly reaching from the pelvis to the stem-skeleton of the ventral, with laterally and obliquely -posteriorly directed bundles of fibres, and b) a lateral mass, the muscles of the rays, issuing from the stem-skeleton, and following the rays to the fin-membrane. a) This powerful groirp of muscles (pi. V, fig. 58 — 61, A and E) in so far does not wholly be- long to the ventral side, as, besides forming the medial edge of the fin, it is also seen on the dorsal side. Looking first at its ventral side we find its origin covering almost the whole ventral surface of the pelvis: between the fin-muscles of the two sides only a triangular piece of the pelvis is to be seen in the middle anteriorly, from the top of which a narrow uncovered streak runs backward to the end of the above (p. 8) described process; from this issues further backward in the linea alba an aponeurotic streak (fig. 58, s), which continues the pelvis, and serves as attachment for part of the same muscular mass. The superficial ventral part is for the greater part composed of distinct bundles of muscles, enveloped in rather firm sheaths of connective tissue, and mostly corresponding in number and direction with the muscles of the rays; but this composition of isolated bundles is effaced anteriorly- laterally and posteriorly-medially. Anteriorly the fibres running obliquely from the pelvis towards the outer margin of the fin ■i Beitrage zur vergleichenden Anatotnie der hinteren Gliedmasse der Fische. Morphol. Jahrbuch. 5 Bd., 1S79, p. 454 seq. 2* I2 ON THE APPENDICES GENITALES (CLASPERS) IN THE GREENLAND SHARK. form a rather solid mass spreading from the fore edge of the pelvis over the broad ray R. The fore- most of the following distinct bundles of muscles cross the ventral surface of the basale reaching as far as to the horny filaments of the fin-membrane, ending here in a tendinous mass; the following bundles only reach to the basale where they are inserted with tendinous ends, from which tendinous part the ray- muscles originate as a prolongation — however, when we look farther backwards, with a distinct inter- position of a narrow stripe of the basale. Between the said foremost bundles, continuing immediately in the ray-muscles, and those attached to the basale, a gradual transition is found, a tendinous part in the superficial layer of the bundles being inserted on the place of transition. The hindmost and medial part of the muscle A is not composed of isolated bundles, but its fibres running rather straightly backwards form a solid mass, inserted on the distal end of the basale, on the pieces 6 U and 6 2 , and on the proximal end of the chief piece of the appendage (Z>). The whole muscular mass, as mentioned, is of a considerable thickness; its deeper part which is also seen from the dorsal side, is not divided into separate bundles; this deeper, more dorsal, part originates from the rounded posterior surface of the pelvis, and even reaches to its dorsal surface; it is inserted along the medial side of the basale and the following joints inside the insertion of the described superficial ventral layer. With this muscle A is closely connected another (pi. V, fig. 59 and 61, E), chiefly seen from the dorsal side. It originates on the medial side of the basale, a little before the middle, its fibres crossing those of the muscle A, and spreading over the appendage; as above the knee of the latter the fibres run oblicpiely across the medial edge of the fin and on to the ventral side, part of the edge of this muscle will consequently be discernible on this side (pi. V, fig. 58 and 60 E). It is spread like a cloak over the chief muscle (D) of the appendage forming a rather thin plate and growing thinner from the ventro-medial edge laterally (cp. fig. 1 in the text); its fibres are attached, partly along the narrow ridge, formed by the dorsal marginal cartilage along the appendix-slit (fig. 61 nf) partly, distally, to a thin, firm aponeurosis (fig. 61 a), covering the muscle Z>, and attached to the elevated distal part of the dorsal marginal cartilage {Rd). In somewhat older animals with well developed appendages this muscle E is as well proximally as distally distinctly separate; in young animals, however, with only little developed appendices (fig. 59) the distal part is still very distinctly marked, but the proximal part is less sharply separated from the large muscular mass , i ; numerous bundles coming from the pelvis and the aponeurotic streak s unite with those from the basale, and numerous bundles from the basale run over among the former and reach to the proximal end of the appendix-stem. The above described muscular group consisting of the muscles .1 and E, will, according to circumstances, be able to act in two different ways; these muscles will, when the antagonists of the dorsal side are not contracted, move the fin from the abdomen, and at the same time draw its inner edge towards the median line, thus moving the two fins towards each other; and when the dorsal antagonists act on the fin, they will move the appendix only, towards the median line, thus acting as extensors for the appendix; the latter action will be facilitated by the muscle E acting lather distally on the appendix (an effect as to the opening of the appendix-slit is of course out of ON THE APPENDICES GENITALES (CLASPERS) IN THE GREENLAND SHARK. ^ the question). Consequently I design the large chief muscle A as Mus cuius adductor [et depressor] pinna- (rf appendicis\ the muscle £ as Muse, extensor (appendzas) 1 ). b. The ventral muscular system of the rays (fig. 58, 60, Ra) is composed of distinctly separated bundles of fibres, or independent muscles in number corresponding with the rays they follow; only anteriorly the independence of the ray-muscles, as mentioned above, is concealed bv coalescence with the lateral bundles of Muse, adductor, coming from the pelvis. The ray-muscles originate on the ventral surface of the basale and the piece b 2 > and run laterally backwards in an oblique direction, each following its ray, but without reaching the end of it; they only reach the horny filaments (the two layers of which comprise a rather considerable part of the lateral ends of the rays) and here pass into tendinous tissue. The hindmost ray-muscle is rudimentary; it does not originate on the stem-skeleton, but on the last ray but two, and passes to the last but one and on to the fin- membrane. 2) The dorsal muscular system of the fin proper (pi. V, fig. 59) is composed of a) a super- ficial part originating from the lateral muscles of the body, and b) a deeper-lying part originating from the stem-skeleton. a) On a part of the body, corresponding in length to the connection between the body and the fin, a system of distinct muscular bundles (O) originate in the aponeurosis covering the lateral muscles of the body, and run obliquely outward and backward to the horny filaments, where they pass into ten- dinous tissue; thus their outward border corresponds to that of the ray-muscles on the ventral side, being considerably distant from the ends of the rays. The hindmost of these bundles are directed straight backwards, corresponding to the direction of the last of the rays. Furthermore from the inner side, the side towards the muscles of the body, of the said system some bundles of fibres (O 1 ) originate running obliquely backward and inward, and attached to the hindmost half of the basale and to the dorsal piece /J; thus the whole system originating from the lateral muscles, is, as to the hinder half, arranged in a feather-like or fanshaped way. b. Quite covered by the superficial layer just described the deeper layer of the dorsal ray- muscles (fig. 59, Ra) is found. These muscles originate from the dorso-lateral side of the basale and of the piece b z as well as from /?, and are seen as distinct bundles corresponding in their number and direction to the rays; they pass into tendinous tissue immediately before the lateral ends of the bundles of the superficial layer, so that the latter reach a little way farther on the rays. However, these two layers are not quite sharply separated, bundles of fibres from the superficial layer reaching to the deeper, and connecting with it; on the hindmost fin-rays the bundles of the deeper layer cross those of the superficial one, this latter spreading in a fanshaped way from the attachment to the body. II. Besides the described separate parts of the fin muscles connected with the appendix ') The muscle which in Acanthias ami other Selachians corresponds to the muscle A, is by Petri called: Flexor f>terygopodii\ but there are several objections to this name. Firstly, the muscle does not only act on the appendix, but on the whole fin (it is also found in the female), and next it cannot well be called the flexor of the appendix, as it is more properly to be regarded as the extensor. The flexion of the appendix is, I suppose, effected by means of the M. compressor sacci, the muscle of the glandular bag (fig. 58, 61, S ), of which more hereafter, together with the muscular layer originating on the body itself ifig. 59 and 61, O). j , ON THE APPENDICES GENITALES (CLASPERS) IN THE GREENLAND SHARK other muscles are found, more especially belonging to this organ, it being inside the skin quite surrounded by muscles except the terminal part. In this muscular system may naturally be distin- guished between: i) The muscles of the chief piece, and 2) those of the glandular bag. 1) The first part (pi. V, fig. 58— 62, D) is composed of one single muscle wrapping in a cloak- like manner the whole of the chief piece from the dorsal marginal cartilage to the ventral one, and to the rounded edge formed by the appendix-stem itself along its lateral surface above this short marginal cartilage; the part of the chief piece situated between these bounds, the lateral surface is for the greater part covered by the muscles of the glandular bag (see fig. 1). The large muscle D is thickest along the medial side of the appendix, and is chiefly composed of longitudinal fibres arising from the whole length of the chief piece; from the foremost part of this, below the knee , arise some specially powerful bundles, and consequently this part of the surface of the skeleton is very rugged; also from the lateral edges arise numerous fibres and bundles, Fig. 1. ft ' Part of a transverse section through the appen- and distally several bundles come from the covering daee of the Greenland Shark (about 26"™ behind • , , TT <■•_ /- > /-« -,• . .-, r " , ' ,. , , aponeurosis a (see pi. V, fig. 61 . Corresponding to the form the beginning of the appeudix-sht). the appen- 1 x ° r ° dix-stem; D M. dilatator; E M. extensor; S M. com- of the appendix-stem this muscle tapers distally, and its pressor; af the appendix-slit; r a rav; // horny ... r ., . , , - , , T . filaments hindmost fibres reach to the base of the style, it is inserted in the firm aponeurosis covering the marginal carti- lages and the whole terminal part, and thus it acts on the style and the two terminal pieces Td and Tv. In contracting it bends the style medially forward at an obtuse angle to the chief piece, where- by the two terminal pieces are also moved; at the same time the thorn is erected on account of its connection with the other terminal pieces, especially Tv, and stands out laterally; as a consequence the distal part of the appendix-slit situated between these movable pieces, is dilated to a rather consider- able degree. I therefore (like Petri) design this muscle as M. dilatator. 2\ Among the muscles of the glandular bag I do not only class a) the muscles immediately wrapping this organ, but also b) some portions (fig. 61, 62, S) arising from the hindmost rays, and forming, in my opinion, with the glandular bag an insolvable whole, only artificially to be detached from it. The glandular bag, as I understand it, has its origin from an invagination of the skin into a muscular mass laterally covering the stem-skeleton in the appendix; by the further growth of this invagination on to the ventral side of the fin part of the muscular mass was brought along as a kind of wrapping of the bag and developing further together with it. Consequently this wrapping cannot be regarded as dermal muscles but belongs to the skeletal muscles; it is also composed of quite the same striated fibres as these; its original relation to the stem-skeleton may, in the fully developed organ, be seen in the still existing attachment along the lateral surface of the appendix-stem (see the transverse section, fig. 1 in the text). a. The glandular bag (pi. V, fig. 58, 60 S) is seen on the ventral side of the fin, where it reaches forward covering a .smaller or larger part of the ray-muscles, according to the development of the whole appendage; while in the youngest specimens it only reaches very little beyond the ON THE APPENDICES GENITALES (CLASPERS) IN THE GREENLAND SHARK. 1C) knee between the stem and the chief piece of the appendix (cf. fig. 58), in the most developed it reaches almost half way towards the pelvis (cp. fig. 60). As the glandular bag in most of the other Sharks, which I have examined, reaches still further, generally even far beyond the pelvis, there is reason to suppose that in none of the ventrals of the Greenland Shark in hand the whole copulatory origan has reached the greatest development, which was already intimated by the description of the skeleton of the terminal part. The connective tissue, investing the muscle-sheath of the glandular bag, is continued on all the specimens as a very thin membrane between the skin and the ray-muscles almost to the pelvis; this membrane may easily be separated as well from the skin as from the muscles, but in the specimens in hand it (perhaps as a consequence of the preservation in brine) is very fragile; it contains no striated muscular fibres. While the dorsal muscular wall of the glandular bag has no intimate connection at all with the part of the fin before the < knee -- only a loose, soft connective tissue here joining the bag to the ray-muscles - it is otherwise at the proximal end of the chief piece, part of the muscles of the bag being inserted on the lateral surface of this part of the skeleton, covering it wholly, and following- it quite down to the terminal part; other fibres attach to the last ray along its medial edge; and some fibres arising from this spot and from the ventral surface of the two last rays, pass into the dorsal muscular wall of the glandular bag and continue it to the ventral marginal cartilage, where they attach to the connective tissue of its inner side. The direction of the fibres of the dorsal muscular wall of the bag otherwise corresponds to that in the ventral wall; as shown in fig. 60, the fibres radiate from the point, where the connection with the skeleton anteriorly ceases; along the medial side they run almost in a parallel direction with the axis of the bag and the appendage, but else on the broader part of the bag they spread in a fanshaped manner to the lateral edge; on the hindmost narrow part they run entirely straight back- ward, and here a few bundles pass into M. dilatator. This arrangement agrees very well with that, which fibres originally directed from before backwards, might be supposed to get by being pressed out of their position by an invagination protruding from the region between * * in fig. 60. A separation of the muscular wall of the bag into two distinct layers is quite out of the question. With regard to Acanthias Petri (1. c. p. 316) has stated that the muscular wall of the bag consists of two layers, an outer one of circular muscles, and an inner one of longitudinal muscles; a separation and arrangement of such a kind however, is not found in Acanthias. any more than in Spiuax or the Greenland Shark. Neither can I admit that the words of Petri (I.e. p. 317) are correct: Die Muskelschicht der Druse wird nicht mit eingestiilpt, soudern sie differenzirt sich allmalieh aus der Bindegewebsschicht nach der Einstiilpung. iCp. also I.e. p. 328). In my opinion, as before has been shown, it admits of no doubt that the muscles of the bag are simply borrowed from the original muscular system of the skeleton 1 ); in the earliest stages of Acanthias -- male embryos of a length of 15°'" -- which I have been able to examine in this respect, the muscles around the rudiment of the glandular bag are already as distinct as those surrounding the stem of the chief piece, and the muscular layer of "i This is corroborated with particular plainness by the arrangement in the Holocephales. r g ON THE APPENDICES GENITALES iCLASPERSl IN THE GREENLAND SHARK. the bag has already been pressed towards the ventral side as well as the other surrounding layers of tissue. b. Intimately connected with the other muscles of the glandular bag is found a powerful muscle (pi. V, fig. 59, 61 and 62, S), seen on the dorsal side, where it forms the lateral lip of the long slit (of), which is the entrance to the bag. It takes its origin from the two hindmost rays (sometimes also having bundles from the last but two) as also from the lateral surface of the piece /?, covered bv the superficial layer (O) coming from the muscles of the body; it is inserted in the tendinous tissue passing over the head of the thorn (T), and firmly connected with the proximal end of the terminal piece Tv, especially with its edge; in this tissue is found imbedded several firm, fibrous portions, which partly calcify, and probably in more developed stages — form a separate piece (Tv 2 ). In the hindmost part this muscle is completely fused with the distal part of the muscles of the glandular bag, and anteriorly it forms a whole with the above mentioned bundles of the dorsal wall of the bag, which arise from the ventral side of the two hindmost ravs; in the interspace a kind of separation is effected by the attaching of the fin-membrane, the connective tissue of which wedges in between the lip muscle » and the wall of the bag itself. This muscle acts antagonistically to M. dilatator, which in a preparation is easily seen by pulling it: thus when M. dilatator by contracting has dilated the groove between the terminal pieces, as described above, and the thorn stands out, the contraction of this outer lip-muscle * of the appendix-slit will again straighten the groove by especially acting on the piece Tv, and at the same time carry back the thorn , so that it will lie against the piece Tv. I find the same muscle in all other Plagiostomes, but in very different stages of development (cp. the following). Petri has mentioned it in Acanthias, but as M. levator of the thorn (I.e. fig. 5, B, C, T, ml); he says: ?Er inserirt sich hiuten vermittels eines starkeu, sehnigen Bandes am vorderen Theil des Spornes ( the thorn ) und hat allein die Aufgabe diesen zu heben. This, however, is quite incorrect: it is not inserted on the thorn, even if its tendon of course by looser tissue is connected with the proximal part of the latter, but on the piece Tv (!>'" in the figures of Petri), of which piece Petri's interpretation is quite wrong (cp. the following); and it does not assist the J/ dilatator, nor raises the thorn, but it counteracts the M. dilatator, and therebv becomes a J/, depressor of the thorn! The carrying back to the position of rest of the terminal pieces is in the Greenland Shark and Acanthias not exclusively brought about by an elastic reaction of the tissues between the firm parts of the skeleton, as asserted by Petri (I.e. p. 303), but this reaction, which certainly exists, is also supported by the action of muscles belonging to the glandular bag, or, at all events, forming part of its muscular system. Taking it for granted that the appendix genitalis by the copulation is really introduced into the cloaca of the female, I imagine the following act to take place: the appendix is guided and brought into the cloaca by means of the muscles belonging to and arising from the fin- muscles proper; next the J\f. dilatator will come into function, and, by its dilating the terminal parts, fix the appendix in the cloaca, and then the muscles of the glandular bag will evacuate its contents into the furrowshaped, in the appendix itself situated part, the walls of which at the same moment will contract, at the same time ejecting the secretion and letting go the firm hold of the apppeudix. As I think the chief action of the muscular wall oi the glandular bag to be the ejection of the ON THE APPENDICES GENITALES (CLASPERS) IN THE SELACHIANS x j secretion, I design it — including the described «outer lip-muscle of the appendix-slit — as Musculus compressor (sacci). II. The Ventral Appendages in other Selachians. For comparison with the facts found in the Greenland Shark, I have examined as man}- other forms of Selachians, as I have been able to get the material for, being soon convinced that the repre- sentations, hitherto found in the literature, gave only a rather incomplete insight into the structure of these organs, and only to a small degree were to be used comparatively. The greater part of my material has consisted of well preserved ventrals, a less part only of skeleton parts, dried or preserved in spirit, which the director of the collection of Vertebrata of the Zoological Museum, Professor Liitken, has been kind enough to place at my disposal. The following description has been divided into three parts of very different extent, of which the first will give a short general account of the copulatory appendages in the Selachians in general, the second a more particular description of the forms, on which this general account has been based, and the third will as a conclusion contain some short remarks as to what for the present may be regarded as tolerably certain concerning the function of these organs. That the particular description will treat more of the skeleton and less of the muscles is occasioned by the relatively small variation of the latter. i. A General View of the Copulatory Appendages in the Selachians. As to the outer form, the same outline is found in the copulatory appendages of all Se- lachians: it is always the inner part of the fin which is prolonged, and formed into an appendage, and this appendage may be more or less free of the fin-membrane; it is most separated in the Holo- cephales, least so in some Sharks; it always consists of a, longer or shorter, proximal part, the shaft, and a, generally shorter, distal part, the terminal part, this latter being always free of the fin- membrane, and (at all events in the Plagiostomes) possessed of a certain mobility. On the dorsal side of the appendage, sometimes, however, quite laterally, a deep furrow or slit, the appendix-slit runs longitudinally, to the posterior end; the edges or lips of this slit can always be opened, at least in two places, viz. at the foremost beginning of the slit in the shaft, and behind in the terminal part; frequently the slit can be widened in a considerable part of the shaft (Somniosiis, Acant/iias, Spiuax, a. o.); there is, however, always a part of the slit, in which widening is prevented by the inner skeleton, or where the lips cannot at all be separated, or sometimes even may be coalesced (the latter in Scyllium and Pristiurtis); the part of the slit situated in the terminal part can (at all events in all Plagiostomes) be widened by muscular action, and again narrowed by- elastic reaction, sometimes assisted by muscular action. The appendix-slit is the duct of a glandular bag which is surrounded by muscles, and in all Plagiostomes with its greater part situated on The Ingolf-Expedition. II, 2. 3 r g ON THE APPENDICES GENITALES iCXASPERS) IN THE SELACHIANS. the ventral side of the fin, under the skin, but in the H olocep hales, where it has only been little developed, limited to the appendix-shaft. The skeleton of the appendage belongs always to the axial stem of the fin-skeleton 1 ); among the rays (in the Plagiostomes, not in the Holocephales) only the hindmost, most frequently the two hindmost, are of importance as serving as attachment for part of the appendix-muscles (those of the glandular bag); as a consequence these rays have been somewhat bent, with the convexity turned dorsally; the two hindmost are often partly, sometimes quite coalesced. With the primary skeletal parts, developed from the fin-stem, join, in the Plagiostomes, several very differently shaped, calcified, secondary skeletal pieces, developed in the connective tissue, surrounding the original, primary skeleton. These secondary pieces show, especially in the terminal part, a considerable variation, both as to form and number, and the different genera, or even species, may present lather important differences; but everywhere may be established the same fundamental type that has been pointed out in the Greenland Shark. In the Plagiostomes the primary skeleton consists of: a large basale (j5), and in continua- tion of this one or more (until a number of four, Rkinobatus) shorter pieces (b s , b 2 , etc.), and finally a terminal joint, the appendix-stem [b); this latter is always long, often considerably longer than the other parts of the stem taken together. To these pieces must be reckoned one more, /?, placed dorsally, parallel to the short stem-pieces b T , b 2 etc. ; most frequently it connects the basale with the appendix-stem, but sometimes it does not reach the basale anteriorly, and is then connected with b x \ in Rliiini it is rudimentary, and only connects the last joint with the appendix-stem; in Narcine it seems to be wan tins:. In quite young males of Plagiostomes (cp. fig. 2 in the text), even in embryos, all these primary skeletal parts are already found; during the growth the terminal joint, the appendix-stem, is prolonged, growing much more than the other parts, and calcifying to some degree in the surface (often to a higher degree than any other part of the primary skeleton of the fin) always, however, with the exception of the distal terminal part, this often wholly, and at all events at its base remaining soft, and consequently flexible; this part of the appendix-stem I (after its form iu the Greenland Shark and many other Sharks) name the end-style (g). Contemporary with the growth and the calcification the secondary skeletal parts develop around the appendix-stem, first as firm, fibrous parts, calcifying by degrees, and finally very hard; some of them belonging to the terminal part are even shining, polished, and dentine-like; they then rise, more or less naked, through the skin; this applies to one piece in Somniosus, Lannia, Selachus, Rkinobatus, Raja radiata; to two pieces in Acanthias, three (four) in Spinax etc. Two of the secondary skeletal parts are always closely connected with the appendix-stem, and may even quite coalesce with it; these two cartilages form shorter or longer ridges, and are situated, one dorsally, the other veutrally, connected with the appendix-stem in such a way as to form with it the part of the appendix-slit that cannot be widened; they are the two marginal cartilages, the ') When A. Fritsch (Zool. Anzeiger, vol. 13. 1890, p. 318, and Fauna tier Gaskohle etc. Bohmens, vol.3. 1895) restores the ventral appendages of the fossil Xeuacanths as lateral structures, developed from rays, I am convinced that he is wrong, and 1ms misinterpreted the fossils. ON THE APPENDICES GENITALES iCEASPERS) IN THE SELACHIANS. r 9 dorsal one (Rd), and the ventral one (Rv); posteriorly they always reach to the end-style, anteriorly more or less forward, commonly not to the same length, and at most to the proximal end of the appendix-stem. Together with this they form the chief piece* of the appendix-skeleton, a name used by several earlier authors, who most frequently have not seen that this piece consists of three parts. The other secondary cartilages, the terminal pieces, together with the end-style form the skeleton of the terminal part, and are more or less movably connected mutually, with the marginal cartilages, and with the end-style. The number of terminal pieces may be different, but in all Plagi- ostomes two are found, one dorsal (Td), and one ventral (Tv), placed as a kind of movable continua- tion of the two marginal cartilages, and with their inner edges joining the end-style of the axial piece, which bv being bent (ventro-medially) is moved in connection with them; thereby they dorsally withdraw more from each other, and the slit between them is widened. Only in a few cases (Trygon violacea, Chlamydoselackus) these two pieces are found alone; in most Sharks a piece Td 2 is joined to the lateral margin of Td, and imbedded together with this in the dorsal lip of the appendix-slit; often a piece Tv 2 is in a like manner joined to Tv\ further is gene- rally found a piece T 3 , placed veutrally and laterally, and often rising through the skin as a spur or thorn; still more pieces may be developed (especially in Raja), but their homologies in the different forms are gener- ally easily pointed out, and are in the special part indi- cated by the letters used. Finally may to the terminal pieces proper be joined one or more « spurious- pieces or covering pieces, enclosing like a shield the terminal pieces, properly so called, on the dorsal side (d) or the ventral side ('•); they are developed in the aponeurosis of the 31. dilatator bespoken later on, which otherwise wraps the terminal part, and serve as insertion for part of this muscle. Such covering pieces are found in all Rays and in some Sharks (for iust. Rhina). As to the abundantly varied structure of the terminal part the reader is referred to the special part; here I shall only add that the simpler forms are generally found in the Sharks, to which may be joined among the Rays Torpedo, Narcinc, Rhinobatus and Trygon, while the most complicated structures are found in the species of Raja. Perhaps it may not be devoid of interest to compare the ventral skeleton of the male with that of the female. In this latter we find the stem composed of a large basale and a different number of shorter joints, among which the terminal one has no ray (typically), but often looks like a ray Kg- 3- Fig. 2. Fig. 2. Somniosus microcephalics, young o" (2 m 50cm). The hindmost part of skeleton of left ventral (con- siderably diminished). The letters as before. * an intercalated extra-ray. Fig. 3. Somn. microcephalus, 5. The corresponding part of skeleton of left ventral, ij + b 2 two coalesced stem-joints; the stippled line indicates the distinction, found between these joints in the right ventral of the same specimen, b the terminal joint. Reduction as in fig. 2. 20 ON THE APPENDICES GENITALES (CLASPERS) IN THE SELACHIANS. itself being more or less rodshaped. This latter joint, I suppose, is the one that in the male is pro- longed and developed into the appendix-stem, which never bears rays; otherwise, however, the number of intermediate joints* between the basale and the terminal joint (the appendix-stem in the male) does not always correspond in the two sexes of the same species, and the part of the stem situated distally of the basale seems upon the whole to be rather varying in females of the same species 1 ). In the female, as was to be expected, all the secondary skeletal pieces are wanting, but besides those also the piece ft of the primary pieces. It is rather difficult to decide with any degree of certainty, how this piece is to be interpreted; perhaps it might be done by following its development. The smallest embryos (of Acanthias) that I have had occasion to examine, however, have had this piece quite independent, in the same position, and with the same relations as in the grown animal. This piece, however, has to be considered as belonging, either to the stem, or to the rays, and in the latter case it is, I think, to be regarded as one ray, there never being any mark of a composition of more jjarts. In several species, as Trygon, Rhinobatus, it might, as to its form, remind of a ray, which then was to be considered as displaced to a higher level than the others, and turned parallel to the axial stem; in Trygon it must be the last, hindmost ray, while in Rliinobatus it could not be the last ray, as more real rays follow farther backward; and so on in the other species: if it was to be considered as a ray, it must, in the different species, be a different ray, displaced and transformed. I think it more probable that the piece j3 belongs to the stem, and has been separated from this by a longitu- dinal division, which might possibly be occasioned by the development of special muscles for the appendix. In the Holocephales (see pi. I) all secondary cartilages are wanting in the fin-skeleton : it is only composed of a large basale bearing all the rays, of a short piece b T , the appendix-stem b, and the dorsal piece ft. The walls of the appendix-slit are produced by a kind of rolling-up of the stem- portions bj, and b, and thus the terminal part is only formed of the hindmost part of the appendix- stem; this latter is rather differently formed in the two genera Chu/iirra and Callorhynchus (see the special part). The appendix-skeleton of the Holocephales accordingly is of a less compound construction than that of the Plagiostomes, and that, as will be seen hereafter, is also the case with the muscular system. This simpler structure evidently in some degree repeats primitive features, but these, on the other hand, are connected with facts, that by no means are primitive, as for inst. the strongly marked separation of the whole organ from the fin proper, the highly specialized form of the primary skeletal parts - against the simpler form in the Plagiostomes (as the simple, rod-like shape of the terminal joint b etc.) — , the connection with other, particular copulatory organs, etc.; these things, as well as many other facts ') In two specimens of ventrals of female Greenland Sharks I find the structure different in the two sides of the same pair of fins. In the left ventral of one specimen the basale is followed by a long and powerful joint, (A1 + &2, fig- 3) bearing two rays, and a ray-like little terminal joint i; in the right fin of the same specimen follow after the basale two short joints 'the- distinction between those is indicated by stippling in fig. 31 61, 62, each bearing one ray, and i 2 also the little ray-like terminal joint i; thus on the left side a coalescing of it and i 2 seems to have taken place. On the left side of the other specimen follows after the basale only one sword-like, compressed piece, taking the place as the terminal joint, and showing in its distal end, which is somewhat flattened, an indication of a longitudinal division; in the right side, on the contrary, the basale is followed by a short joint (6i) bearing a ray and a compressed terminal joint ii). Consequently, if we suppose a coalescing of it and & on the right side, together with the last ray, we shall arrive at the structure on the left side. As far as I have seen, the female fin-skeleton of Acanthias shows similar variations. ON THE APPENDICES GENITALES (CLASPERS) IN THE .SELACHIANS. 2 I in the structure of these animals indicate that the Holacephales by no means occupy a primitive position among the Selachians. As to the skeleton of the ventral in the female, the basale (in Chimera) has distally only one small, tap-like joint, standing both for the piece b T , and the appendix-stem (b) in the male 1 ). What has been given in the earlier literature as to the skeleton of the ventral appendages in Selachians, is generally only isolated descriptions without any real understanding; only Gegenbaur 2 ) and Petri have compared several forms, but neither of them has been able to recognise a common type. Gegenbaur (1. c. p. 452) has interpreted the terminal pieces as modified rays, but on account of the circumstances in the Cliimccra, he indicates (p. 456) the possibility that they may be parts separated from the stem-skeleton ; he does not know the marginal cartilages, and he has considered several early stages of the skeleton as definitive forms of it. Petri cpiite correctly has seen that the terminal pieces and marginal cartilages - - which latter, however, he has not recognised in all the species he has examined -- are secondary structures, and have nothing to do with the rays; the terminal stem-joint itself which I have called the appendix-stem (/;), he has interpreted correctly in Raja, but wrongly in Acanthias and Scyllium*) --- the only Sharks examined by him -- as well as in Torpedo -t) (he has not examined Chimara). Some earlier authors have seen the piece ft in some specimens, while it by others has been overlooked, or at all events has not been mentioned. Only Gegenbaur and Petri have sought its origin in a transformation of other skeletal parts of the fin?). Gegenbaur does not mention it at all in Raja, Carcharias and Scylliuiu 6 ) but in Hctcrodontus and Acanthias (I.e. fig. 16 and fig. 19,/'), and in Chimmra (fig. 23 r'); in the last named it is interpreted as a ray, but in the two former as belonging to the stem-skeleton?); accordingly Gegenbaur has not seen that in Chimccra it is the same skeletal piece as in the Plagiostomes. Petri thinks it to be a coalescence of basal parts of rays, being of opinion that it bears rays in Acanthias and Torpedo; accordingly in his figures he marks it /. This supposition, however, is wrong 8 ); I never found rays 1 v. Davidoff (I.e. p. 473, pi. XXIX. fig. lS<$) thinks it only to be corresponding to <5i. Unfortunately I have only had occasion to examine skeletonized ventrals of Chimara 9, in which this joint was wanting, so that the fin-stem consisted only of the basale. 2) Ueber die Modificationeu des Skelets der Hintergliedmaassen bei den Mannchen der Selachier und Chimiiren. Jen. Zeitschr. vol. 5, 1S70, p. 452. 3) In these Sharks Petri supposes the stem to end with a long and a short joint; in Acanthias as the short terminal joint he has interpreted one of the terminal pieces (my piece Tv), in Scyllinm the soft end-style. 4) As to Torpedo see p. 49. 5) Bloch, M. E. : Von den vermeinten doppelten Zeugungsgliederu der Rocheu und Haye. Schr. der Berl. Gesell- schaft Naturf. Freunde, vol.6, 17S5 [Raja clavata ■ [= radiata]) ; and: Von den verm, mannlichen Gliedern des Dornhayes, ibid. vol. 8, 1788, does not mention this piece in Acanthias, but in Raja, where he calls it: .der vierte Knochen des Schenkels », pi. IX, fig. 1,0. Cuvier (Duvernoy): Lecons d'anatomie comparee, 2 Ed., 1846, vol 8, p. 306, designates it as Calcaueum in Raja; the same appellation is used, likewise for Raja, by Moreau: Hist. nat. des Poissons de la France, vol.1, 18S1, p. 249. I have not found it mentioned by other authors. *>j Of these three forms G. has only had quite young specimens, in which the secondary pieces had not yet devel- oped. The fault made here by G. viz. to consider this stage as the full-grown state, and accordingly as an especially simple form in these Plagiostomes. has already been corrected by Petri (I.e. p. 293). It is to be supposed, however, that the piece ,j had been developed in all three forms, as in embryos of Acanthias of a length of only 15cm it is already quite distinct and relatively as large as in the full-grown animal. 7) I am quite unable to understand the place in question (1. c. p. 45 1) in Gegenbaur; there is a regrettable discre- pancy between the letters in the text, and those in the figures, and also, I think, a change of pieces, which makes the whole confused; so much, however, is certain that the piece which in the figures 16 and 19 is marked b (my piece /S) does not in Acanthias bear any ray; it never bears rays at all. 8) For further details see under Acanthias and Torpedo. When Petri, to support his construction of this piece as 22 ON THE APPENDICES GENITALES 1CLASPERS1 IN THE SELACHIANS. attached to this piece, but always found it placed at another level than that of the nearest rays, and I take it to he a specially separated part of the stem-skeleton. The muscular system (see pi. V and VI) does not show the rich variation found in the skeleton, being upon the whole rather uniform, which is a natural consequence of the fact that the part of the skeleton, particularly multifarious both as to the number and form of the single pieces, viz. the terminal part, has no muscles of its own; the muscles (generally) only acting on the terminal part as a whole. Only the medial side of the fin-muscles has been specially developed in the male; the muscles spreading over the lateral parts of the fin, i. e. the ray-muscles of the upper and lower side, and the dorsal layer originating from the lateral muscles of the bodv, are chieflv the same in both sexes, and show in the different forms examined so very few differences that I, also in the special part, pass over them. In the medial muscular system may be distinguished between a more proximal and a distal part, not however strongly separated, especially not so in many Plagiostomes , while in the Holoce- phales the separation is more distinct, the appendage of the latter being more independent of the fin. In the Plagiostomes I generally find the same type, as has been described in the Greenland Shark. The proximal part consists of a Muse, adductor [et depressor) piuiicc (or appendicis) [A), and a J/, extensor appendicis (E). Muse, adductor does not in any of the forms examined by me show any separation into an independent, superficial ventral layer, and a deeper, more dorsal one, but forms a whole 1 ); the ventral side, however, appears to a great extent separated into single bundles correspon- ding to the ray-museles, while the dorsal side shows nothing of the kind. The fibres arise from the pelvis, as well from the ventral, as, though often to a smaller extent, from the dorsal surface, as also from a tendinous stripe prolonging, as it were, the hindmost edge of the pelvis into the median line; they run oblicpiely-laterally , and are inserted on the basale, on the following joints (b M b 2 etc.), and on the proximal end of the appendix-stem; often, however, the superficial medial fibres run on and mingle with the M. dilatator. The fibres forming the medial marginal part, run almost straight from before backward, and form always a solid mass not divided into separate bundles; the foremost, lateral parts (as in the Greenland Shark) are coalesced with the deeper-lying ray-muscles. M. extensor (appendicis) (E) is mostly a rather flat muscle, situated on the dorsal side of the previous one; it originates on the medial side of the basale, often moreover on the pieces 6 1} b 2 , etc., and is inserted on the appendix-stem, usually at the proximal end, but sometimes farther backward, and the hindmost part of this muscle then spreads in a cloak-like manner over part of M. dilatator (comp. the Greenland Shark). This muscle generally is very distinct, already in quite young animals with undeveloped appendages; but in Lanuia I find its fibres woven into those of 2f. adductor to a coalescing of basal parts of rays, refers to the fact that such a coalescing of rays is frequently seen in other parts of the fin, especially anteriorly, he does not see that the basal joints of the rays always are many times longer than the distal, and that this difference of size is also preserved by such concrescences. '! The type of the arrangement of the ventral muscular system put down by v. D avidoff (1. c. p. 4561 for Heptanchus 9, which reminds of the arrangement in Chimara, I have had no occasion to see in any Plagiostome; v. D. asserts to have l " 1 "" 1 '< very generally, and refers to Acanthias almost as an exception; however, I can with certainty see no other forms mentioned in his text than Carcharias as belonging to the same type as Heplanclms. ON THE APPENDICES GENITADES (CLASPERS) IN THE SELACHIANS. 23 such a degree that it does not appear as an independent muscle, and only artificially is to be separ- ated from the former. The distal part, the muscular system of the shaft, is typically composed of two muscles: M. dilatator (/)), and M. compressor (saccz) (S). M. dilatator [/>) is always very large and powerful; it wraps in a cloak-like manner the appen- dix-stem until the terminal part, leaving only the lateral surface uncovered, part of which is occupied by M. compressor. M. dilatator originates forward, either from the appendix-stem only, or frequently also, above the knee of this latter, from the pieces 6 l} etc., or from the basale; posteriorly it is attached to the aponeurotic wrapping of the terminal part, or, when covering pieces have been devel- oped from the wrapping, partly to these. Besides fibres of it often go to the skin, and here and there bundles pass into the M. compressor. The chief action of this muscle is to bend the terminal pieces together with the soft end-style (veutro-) medially, by which means the terminal part of the appendix- slit is widened; at the same time some of the terminal pieces are often turned from their position of rest in such a manner that they rise through the skin, or are erected so that they stand out free (as the spur or thorn in Sonmiosiis and Lauiua, the -claws in Spinax, the hook and the spur in Acanthias; the large piece T^ in Ra/a, etc.). When the contraction ceases the appendix-slit will again be narrowed, and the erected skeletal pieces will again be laid, partly mechanically by elastic reaction of the soft connective tissue, but partly also the M. compressor will be able to support this latter operation. Muse, compressor shows in the Plagiostomes so particular a structure, that when it has been examined at all, it has hitherto been misapprehended, the greater part of it being understood as a bag composed of dermal muscles. This muscle, I suppose, originally occupies in the Plagiostomes a place, similar to that in the Holocephales (see later); i.e. it covers the lateral surface of the appendix-stem, or very frequently only its proximal part, and anteriorly it also reaches on to the piece t 3 and the (two) last rays. Into this muscle, a longitudinal folding of the outer skin penetrates from the dorsal side of the shaft; this folding forms the appendix-slit and the glandular bag, the former leading into the latter. The fore- most part of the folding growing on ventrally, carries with it the wrapping muscle, and then both grow on together, and form a singularly thickwalled bag which from the slit-formed opening on the dorsal side grows 011 between the last ray and the stem skeleton to the ventral side of the fin, where it becomes situated between the outer skin and the ventral ray-muscles. In Sharks the foremost, blind part very often grows much farther forward, not only near to the pelvis, (Spinax, Rhiua, Somniosas) but in many, I think in most Sharks it reaches forward of the pelvis (for inst. Acanthias, Scyllium, Pristiurus, Laiiuia, Selae//us)'), and then the bags of the two sides are in contact a long way in the median line (fig. 4). In the Rays the bag is much smaller, (pi. VI, fig. 68), but on the other M In Mustehis /avis the glandular bag reaches as far forward as to the pectorals; i. e. the part before the pelvis is of far more the double length of that behind it. I have myself only had immature males of Must, tavis for examination ; but this statement I found on a drawing without any text, left by A. Schneider which, together with other drawings, has been published as an appendix to the fragment left by S. : Studien zur Systematik und zur vergl. Auat., Eutwickelungsge- schichte und Histologic der Wirbelthiere 1Z00I. Beitrage, vol. 2, 1890). The figure in question (pi. 25, fig. 11) is explained as: Mustelus l&vis. Brustflossen und Bauchflossen mit Saamenblasen. Die Cutis entfernt. Bauchseiu-. 24 ON THE APPENDICES GENITALES iCLASPERS) IN THE SELACHIANS. hand its secreting part is especially developed, and its muscular wall somewhat more complicated. In the part of the M. compressor forming the muscular wall of the bag, the direction of the fibres may be rather different, but they chiefly radiate in bent lines towards the periphery, or round this to the dorsal surface; this latter is only by loose connective tissue connected with the ray-muscles. In the part in the shaft the direction is more straight, parallel to the axis; this is the case with the fibres covering the lateral surface of the appendix-stem (or a short proximal part of it), as also with those forming the outer, lateral border of the appendix-slit. This lateral part most frequently appears on the dorsal side as an independent muscle, and might be called the outer lip-muscle , being, as it were, separated from the other part of the wall of the bag by the at- tachment of the fin-membrane. By a closer examination and by a transverse section through this region (cp. fig. i and 14 in the text) I have been convinced of its forming a whole with the other parts of the muscular wall of the bag, with which also the corre- sponding part in the Holocephales forms a complete union (see later). A large part of this outer lip-musele» originates anterior- ly from the piece /9 and the hindmost ray, or rays; posteriorly it is inserted partly on the inner investment of the ventral marginal cartilage, partly on the aponeurotic covering of the ventral termi- nal pieces, and acts through this especially on the piece Tv. The muscular coat formed by M. compressor will by contracting expel the fluid secreted from the epithelium of the bag; but besides its hindmost, lateral part, the outer lip-muscle , when it is long and powerfully developed (as in Sharks with a short ventral marginal cartilage, for inst Somniosus, Spinax , Acanthias, R/uiia), will act antagonistically to M. dilatator, i.e. narrow the dilated terminal part, and lay the erected ter- minal pieces. The muscular system of the appendix which here has been briefly represented in its typical characteristics, shows in different Plagiostomes special modifications, as to which the reader is referred to the special part I shall only here state that the part of M. compressor which appears as the outer lip-muscle of the appendix-slit, commonly, as to its size and development, is adjusted to the length of the ventral marginal cartilage; therefore it is very small in Scyllium (pi. VI, fig. 66, S), and in 1'ristiurtts, rather small in Raja (fig. 67, S); longer and more powerful in Torpedo, but especially de- veloped in Sharks as Sommosus, Acanthias, Spinax, Rliina , a. o. From the part of M. compressor wrapping the bag proper, is in the Rays developed a special muscular layer around the voluminous gland found in these latter. In the Sharks (with the exception of Rkina) the inner epithelium of the bag does not form real glands, but only contains secreting cells, and is accordingly very simple as secreting apparatus. In the Rays, however, has been developed a bulky gland protruding as a Fig. 4. Acanthias vulgaris rj. The ventrals seen from the lower surface. 5 M. com- pressor, A M. adductor , D M. dila- tator, R ray-muscles, T$ the < spur . The stippled contour indicates the an- terior extent in another specimen. ON THE APPENDICES GENITALES (CLASPERS) IX THE SELACHIANS. 25 thick, oval body from the dorsal wall of the bag into its inner space, and almost filling it; when the ventral wall of the bag is opened, this body is immediately seen, and in sound animals it is sometimes seen rather distinctly through the skin 1 )- Down the middle of the gland rnns straight or obliquely (Trygon) a longitudinal furrow, in which is seen a great number of rather large holes with raised margins: they are the excretory openings of collective dncts from a solid mass of large, dichotomously divided, tubular glands. This gland is on all sides until the longitudinal furrow enclosed by a mus- cular layer, originating from the dorsal muscular wall of the bag. By this special muscular layer the secretion may evidently be ejected into the inner space of the bag, and then by contracting of the muscular wall of the bag itself be driven on, partly through the large opening at the base of the shaft, partly posteriorly through the tube , formed by the marginal cartilages, and 011 through the terminal part; in full-grown animals these latter ducts are generally found filled with the secretion. Among the Sharks I have only in Rhina found a similar bulky gland, but situated only in the shaft (for further particulars see under Rhina). A survey of the medial fin-muscles in the females of the Plagiostomes will show that they are of a considerably simpler structure than those of the male. In the female is found only one single muscle, a M. adductor pinna (pi. V, fig. 63, 64, A) originating in quite the same way as in the male from the pelvis and its aponeurotic prolongation in the ventral median line, and built in a similar manner as to the division of the ventral side in separate bundles, the passing of the foremost lateral part into the ray- muscles, a. s. o. ; here , too , the medial marginal portion forms a solid mass, continu- ing as a posteriorly tapering bundle on to the terminal joint of the fin-stem 2 ). It is then -- especially considering the intermingling of fibres that often takes place in the different muscles of the male -- an obvious conclusion that an adductor of a similar simple construc- tion as the one, now found in the female, has been the origin of the J/, adductor, the J/, extensor, and the M. dilatator, perhaps also of the J/, compressor of the male. When the hindmost joint of the fin-stem developed into the appendix-stem, the distal part of the orginal, simple M. adductor might be thought to be brought along at the same time, so that part of the deeper-lying fibres would origin- ate from the stem-skeleton, by which process the J/, dilatator would arise; while in the proximal part too a group of fibres originating from the stem separated as the M. extensor (in Lainua this muscle is only part of the M. adductor). The .1/. compressor might have the same origin as the J/ dilatator, but more likely it represents the very hindmost ray-muscles. In the males of the Holocephales ipl. VI, fig. 69 — 71) the separation between a proximal muscular group and a distal one, placed on the appendix-shaft, is, as before mentioned, more strongly marked than in the Plagiostomes. The proximal group is formed by a M. adductor, corresponding to that of the latter, as to the detailed structure of which I refer to the special part; a separate M. extensor is not found. The distal part is also here composed of a M. dilatator and a M. compressor, 1 This gland was already seen long ago. J. Th. K 1 e i n ( Historise piscium naturalis promovendae missus tertius etc. cum observationibus circa genitales Raja? maris etc. 1742), as far as I have seen, is the first author, who mentions it. He thinks the gland to be a kind of testis (forte officina seminis |, but observes that he has not been able to find any connections with the kidneys, nor with vesiculis seminalibus — adesse tamen possunt >. E. Olafsen in his Icelandic voyage (II p. 9S8) takes the same view of the gland as Klein. 2 ) The figure of Acanihias J given bv v. Da vidoff, 1. c. pi. XXIX, fig. 12, is not correct with regard to the direction of the fibres; so I have given a new figure. The Ingolf-Expedition. II. 2, 4 OX THE APPENDICES GENITALES CLASPERS) IN THE SELACHIANS. the latter being of special interest with regard to a comparison with the Plagiostomes; it is much thicker than the M. dilatator, and covers the lateral surface of the stem-piece b z , and of the piece b to the terminal part. Into this mnscle sinks through the dorsal appendix-slit a continuation of the outer skin as a « glandular-bag , which on account of its simplicity might be called rudimentary , when compared to that of the Plagiostomes, as it has evidently remained in a similar stage of development as that, with which it begins in those; by a further development forward and ven- trally a quite similar glandular bag would arise as the one described as characteristic in the Pla- giostomes. The direction of the fibres of the M. compressor is rather peculiar in the Holocephales (see the special part); here I shall only mention that part of the fibres seen dorsally (fig. 70), runs along the lateral edge of the appendix-slit rather straight from the piece [i backward in quite the same manner as in the corresponding part, the outer lip-muscle , of the M. compressor in the Plagiostomes. The wdiole structure of this muscle forms, as it seems to me, an incontestable proof as to the correct- ness of my interpreting the muscular coat of the glandular bag of the Plagiostomes as part of the skeletal muscles proper. In the female the whole muscular system of the appendix is wanting; according to v. Da- vidoff the little terminal joint has an attachment for part of the dorsal muscles arising from the wall of the body (1. c. p. 477, pi. XXIX, fig. 18, ps), corresponding to the attachment of the same muscle on the piece b z in the male; just on account of this v. Da vidoff exjulains the terminal joint to be homologous with this piece. The fin-muscles of the male have been rather slightly treated in the earlier literature; a com- parison between several forms has been almost quite out of the question, only a few forms having been described. Thus among the Sharks Acantliias has already been mentioned by Bloch, among the Rays some Raja- species by several authors (Raja radiata very briefly and incompletely by Bloch, Raja circ n ton's [or elavata\ by Duvernoy, R. elavata by Vogt &: Pappenheim and later by Moreau), Chimara monstrosa by v. Davidoff. Petri alone has examined several different forms and tried to make a comparison, but he cannot be said always to have been successful or to have found the correct interpretation. While he upon the whole pretty correctly has interpreted the muscle I have called M. adductor, -- his M. flexor pinna, or pterygopodii, a name rejected by me as presum- ably not suitable, -- and M. dilatator, a name introduced by him (at all events in Scyllium, Acanthias and Torpedo), the other muscles have either been misapprehended or not at all mentioned. The M. extensor he has only seen in Scyllium and Raja, where he calls it M. flexor pterygopodii inferior, and of my J/, compressor he has only mentioned the part, which I have called the v outer lip-muscle » (of the appendix-slit), in Acanthias and Raja, and with different appellations, respectively as M. levator (of the spur) and as M. flexor biceps (which latter name is also given to a quite different muscle in Scyllium), and he has assigned to it different, partly misapprehended, functions. It has already been observed that both Petri and all other authors, who have mentioned the glandular bag, have understood the muscular wall to be a separately developed dermal muscular system, and consequently omit it by the mentioning of the fin-muscles proper. In the special part account will be rendered of the earlier literature, and the particular works will be referred to. ON THE APPENDICES GENITA] BS (CLASPERS) IN THE SELACHIANS. 27 2. Special Part. Selachoidei. Spinacidce. Acanthias vulgaris Risso. (PI. I, fig. 10, 11.) The common picked Dog-fish has been so often examined that I think a more particular de- scription of the external features of the copulatory appendages to be superfluous; I may refer to Petri 1 ) (with regard to whose description, however, I must remark that the investment with dermal teeth at the places of transition to naked parts does not cease gradually, but is quite sharply bounded; the dorsal side is wholly naked, as is also on the ventral side the hindmost point of the terminal part), as also to the earlier description by Bloch 2 ) and Homesj. In a specimen of the length of 64 cm the following measures were found: Length of the appendix (from the fore-edge of the cloaca) . . 6,5 cm part free of the fin 3) icm terminal part 2, 2Cm appendix-slit 4i 2Cm Breadth of the appendix ab. i cm The skeleton has not been cpiite correctly described by any of the earlier authors + ). Between the basale and the appendix is found only one short joint ($,), and besides the dorsal piece /??); this latter articulates anteriorly with the basale, posteriorly with the appendix-stem b, and medially with b t ; its lateral edge is convex, projecting somehwat in the shape of a roof over the two hindmost rays ; these rays are borne by the piece b l , and are often coalesced ; they are stronger and longer than the last ray but two, which latter comes from the basale. The stem of the chief piece of the appendix has a length like B -\- b z , and proximally towards its articulation with b 1 is found a ridge (at b in fig. 10) projecting in a somewhat keel-like manner; in the hindmost half it has laterally a little trough-like hollow. The soft end-style is short 6 ), flatly rounded, and reaches not nearly to the end of the terminal part. The dorsal marginal cartilage?) (Rd) can forward be indistinctly traced as a rounded ridge to about the letter x in fig. 11 (it is more -I I.e. p. 300, pi. XVII. fig. 5, A. '-\ 1. c. 178S, p. 9, pi. 2, fig. 1. 3) On the Mode of breeding of the Ovoviviparous Shark etc. Phil. Trans. 1810, Pt. II, p. 205, pi. IX and X; in the lastmentioned place the ventrals ami the appendages have been drawn in a position, which they scarcely naturally would be able to have. 4) Drawings are found not only in Bloch. Gegenbaur and Petri, but also in Molin: Sullo scheletro degli Squali. pi. Ill, fig. 7; Memorie dell' 1st. Veneto, vol.8, 1859, but without any explanation or description in the text. = i Gegenbaur, fig. 16, b\ Petri, fig. 5 D, >■'. •' Gegenbaur, fig. 17, /; it has been quite overlooked by Bloch and Petri. 1 Men tinned neither by Gegenbaur nor Petri. The hindmost end of it is the Processus a am Schienbein» 0- c. fig. 31 of Bloch. Neither of these authors have seen independent marginal cartilages in Acanthias. \ ON THE APPENDICES GENITALES (CLASPERS) IN THE SELACHIANS. distinct, when the piece is dried); posteriori}- it is distinctly elevated as an edge of the appendix-slit. The ventral marginal cartilage {Rt>) is shorter, resembles the corresponding one in the Greenland Shark, and has, as in the latter, a plate-like part 1 ) folded to the dorsal side; on the concave inner side it has furthermore a strong, elevated process; in the furrow between this process and the folded part the proximal end of the thorn is placed. There are four terminal pieces. Td 2 ) is narrow, with the foremost part of its medial edge closely connected with the end-style, and behind this with the edge of the ventral piece Tv; distally it takes the form of a flattened, sharp- edged hook; this hook-shaped part rises uncovered through the skin, is smooth, shining, and dentine- like. Td is with part of its lateral edge connected with a quite thin, plate-formed piece 3), Td 2 , also anteriorly connected with the marginal cartilage Rd; it is placed in the skin forming the dorsal lip of the appendix-slit of the terminal part, and corresponds to the piece Td,, indicated in the Green- land Shark. The ventral terminal piece, Tv4), is considerably broader and longer than the dorsal one, rounded on the ventral (outer) surface, hollowed like a spoon towards the appendix-slit; except the hindmost ]3art it is firmly calcified; the foremost part of the medial edge is connected with the end- style, and behind this with Td, the hook of the latter lying freely in the outermost spoon-like end of the former piece; in the proximal end it has medially an articular process for articulation with the above mentioned process of the concave side of the marginal cartilage Rr, and its lateral edge is firmly connected with a strong, thin membrane (fig. n, Tv 2 ), serving in the foremost part for attaching the outer lip-muscle of the glandular bag; this membrane then corresponds to the similar, but thicker one in the Greenland Shark, and to the piece Tv 2 in Sjhinax. The fourth terminal piece, T 3 , is the one called the < spur» 5) by the different authors; with the proximal, somewhat head-shaped end it is attached inside of the folded plate of the marginal cartilage Rv to the above mentioned process, and to the proximal and lateral end of the piece Tv; it is formed as a triangular thorn or spine, longitudinally somewhat twisted, with two concave surfaces; it is firm, shining, dentine-like, and the greater part of it is uncovered by the skin. It can be moved quite in the same manner as the corresponding spine in the Greenland Shark. The muscular system. The M. adductor shows the general typical relations. The M. extensor reminds very much of the same one in the Greenland Shark; as in the latter it has here its origin on the medial side of the basale and b u stretches over the «knee of the appendix-stem as a thin, flat covering over the M. dilatator, and inserts itself along the boundary line of the dorsal marginal cartilage. The M. dilatator originates proximally with a dorsal portion at the same place as the M. extensor and quite covered by it, that is to say some way up on the basale; on the ventral side its proxi- n Bloch, Processus d\ Gegenbaur, fig. 15. 16, a; Petri, fig. 5, D, E, pr\ regarded by all only as a process 011 the chief piece. 1 Bloch, der Haken, fig. 2, c, fig. 6; Gegenbaur fig. 16, 17. a; Petri, fig. 5. hk. )) Petri, fig. 5, la; it is neither mentioned nor drawn by Bloch or Gegenbaur. 4) Bloch: der breite Knochen, fig. 2, d, fig. 5; Gegenbaur, fig. 15 — 17, c; Petri, fig. 5. &"', he interpreting it as tlu- terminal joint of the stem. Bloch, der Sporn, fig. 2, c, fig.4; Gegenbaur, fig. 15, 16, a'; Petri, fig. 5, sp and ca. ON THE APPENDICES GENITALES (CLASPERS) IN THE SELACHIANS. 29 mal origin accordingly is much more backward, at the distal end of the M. adductor; it is inserted as usual, its aponeurosis being especially attached to Tv and Td\ the latter piece, .the hook , is turned (round its medial edge as the axis) out of its position in the spoon-shaped end of the former, when the muscle is contracted during the dilation. The part of the M. compressor wrapping the bag, is much distended, and consequently rather thin, corresponding to the considerable extent of the bag anteriorly (see fig. 4 in the text). The part inserted on the lateral surface of the appendix-stem, is very small, reduced to a few bundles of fibres on the proximal end of this part of the skeleton, which otherwise is almost quite enclosed by the M. dilatator. The part, which as outer lip-muscle forms the lateral limit of the appendix-slit, seems to me to receive in its surface some fibres coming from the muscular layer originating from the lateral muscles of the bodv, but otherwise it originates as usual on the hindmost rays and on /?; it is inserted with a kind of tendon in the above-mentioned membrane on Tz>, and consequently it acts antagonistically against the M. dilatator, and at the same time lays the spur 7\ ' 1. Spinax niger Bonap. (PI. I, fig. 12, 13.) The very peculiar-looking appendages in this common Shark have singularly enough been very little mentioned by earlier authors, and by many, also among the later, they are not mentioned at all. Gunnerus 2 ), in his description of the «Sort-Haa», says: -they (i.e. the two Membra genitalia) were supplied with some sharp bony spines, such as 1 have seen on the Membra of several Rays, when the ends have been turned inside out. KroyerS) says: «At the end of the copulatory appen- dages of the males are found three crooked thorns or horny claws, and a tapering dermal flap, which behind projects a little over these claws. The claws are movable against each other, and form a kind of prehensile organ. In the position of rest they are hidden between a pair of small cartilaginous plates, and the skin covering these plates. » This is the most complete, and also, I think, the most correct description I have seen-*). Dumerils) gives a drawing of the appendix, but with no explana- tion whatever (nor in the text neither); the drawing is rather difficult to understand, neither is it correct; thus the dermal flap mentioned by Kroyer appears in this figure as a thorn, although it is ■l Petri (I.e.) designates this part of 1113- M. compressor as M. levator (fig- 5. ml), and attributes to it a dilating effect, having < allein die Aufgabe diesen (den Sporn) zu heben , and thus he in this place speaks of two dilating muscles. The incorrectness of this, however, is easily pointed out. Contrary to Petri, Bloeh upon the whole has a correct understanding of the mobilitv of the spur, speaking (1. c. p. 131 of eiuen sehr sonderbaren Mechanismus. Davon mir wenigstens in der Anatomie kein ahnlicher bekandt ist . Bloch has a chiefly correct description of the muscular system; he distinguishes between three muscular portions, the first of which being the ventral ray-muscles , the second, which he compares to the < adductor femoris in man, is my M. adductor, the third M. dilatator + my M. extensor. He describes the glandular bag as a parti- cular organ, to which he does not ascribe any muscular walls , as he supposes that the other 1 2 1 muscles expel its klebrigte Feuchtigkeit . Neither has Petri seen my M. extensor as a separate muscle in Acanthias (see his fig. 5, B, and the descrip- tion p. 3021; but it is also to be acknowledged that in this species it is very closely connected with the M. dilatator, especially proximallv. 2 ) Throudhjemske Selskabs Skrifter II, 1763, p. 319. 3) Danmarks Fiske vol.111, 1S52 — 53, p. 908. ■ 1 Miiller & Henle, System. Beschr. der Plagiostomeu, 1S41, p. S6, say: As no thorns are mentioned, L. must have examined only undeveloped appendages. The appendix, when fully developed, is short, clumsy, thick, and reaches only a very little farther backward than the end of the fin-membrane, the free part of which is also very short. Dermal teeth are not found, neither on the dorsal, on the medial, nor on the greater part of the ventral side, except on this latter laterally, near the fin-mem- brane. In the numerous, developed appendices, examined by me, the terminal part was always very much dilated, and such was also the case in the specimens, I have caught alive; in the dilated state the terminal part stands almost at a right angle to the stem, its hinder end with the soft dermal flap (a) pointing inward towards the middle line; the dilated part of the furrow then looks like a concave sole of the foot, in whose &heel» is seen the opening, through which the secretion of the glandular bag is probably ejected. Three polished, hard points protrude like claws through the skin, one at the dorsal lip of the furrow, the second at the ventral lip, and the third, and longest, juts out, ventrally and laterally, from the spot, where the fin-membrane becomes free of the appendix. In specimens of the length of 35,5 c:n — 38,5 c,n the following measures are found 2 ). Length of appendix (from the fore edge of the cloaca) . . abt. 2,5 cm — 3S cm - the part, free of the fin - the terminal part - the appendix-slit Breadth of the appendix - o,6 cm — o,S cm The skeleton. Between the basale and the appendix are found two small pieces (b l and b 2 ), each bearing one of the two hindmost rays (accordingly b 1 -\- b z in Sfinax = b Y in Acanthias); never- theless these rays may be found coalesced, and are, as usually, directed straight backward, parallel to the appendix. The piece /} is relatively somewhat longer than in Acautliias, but of a similar form. The axial part of the chief piece of the appendix is somewhat more clumsy than in Acauthias, but otherwise of a similar form, and also supplied with a short, soft end-style; including this latter the stem is only a little longer than the basale. The marginal cartilages, too, show chiefly the same relations as in Acanthias. M Sveriges och Norges Fiskar, vol.3, 1S91. P- 677- -1 It is somewhat difficult to obtain exact measurings on account of the terminal part being bent. Fig- 5- Fig. 5. Spinax niger. The appendage of the right side with part of the fin-membrane, seen from the dorsal side, somewhat enlarged. The terminal part is dilated, f the folded , free end of the fin-membrane ; at the fin has been cut from the body. afi the dilated part of the appendix-slit. Fig. 6. The dilated terminal part, seen from behind, a the soft terminal flap, af the spot where the appendix- slit passes into the dilated, terminal part of the furrow. I)2 c.n -rem 1,8"" 0,6 cm - ON THE APPENDICES GENITALIS (CLASPERS) IN THE SELACHIANS. 31 The terminal pieces are 5. The dorsal one, Td, is somewhat s-shaped, round, and articulates medially with the end-style, while the hindmost part of it projects through the skin as a curved, polished claw; as in Acanthias, it is united with a thin lamellar piece, Td 2 , which piece, with the exception of the hindmost point, is qnite covered by the skin forming the dorsal lip of the furrow. The ventral piece Tv is also somewhat s-shaped, broader than the dorsal one, thick at the base, becoming thinner distally and laterally; it is concave like a spoon on the side towards the furrow, on the other side rounded. At the proximal part of the lateral edge it is firmly united with a hard, dentine-like piece 7r' 2 , which in Acanthias is only represented by an uncalcified mem- brane. This piece is before (proximally) prolonged to a long, flat end, behind (distally) to a shorter one, projecting through the skin as the before mentioned claw in the ventral lip of the furrow; the piece is rather narrow, ventrally concave, dorsally rounded. In moving it follows the piece Tv. The last piece T 3 corresponds to the thorn, in Acanthias and Somniosus , and is also here formed as an elegant, bent, rounded and completely smooth thorn with the proximal end head-shaped. It is quite out of the question that these «claws», as supposed by K rover, should be able to act as a prehensile organ , as they cannot properly be moved against each other; but they will be very able to fix the appendix firmly in a hollow, as by the dilatation of the terminal part their points are turned in three opposite directions, as may be seen from fig. 6 in the text The muscular system. From the 31. adductor has been separated a long, flat bundle as a particular muscle originating before from the medial aponeurotic stripe together with the other fibres of the 31. adductor, and then on the dorsal side passing obliquely over the 31. extensor and next over the M. dilatator; on the appendix it follows the appendix-slit, and forms together with the 31. dilatator the medial lip of this slit; partly it is attached in the skin of this lip, but chiefly on the proximal end of the piece Td,. This muscle evidently is instrumental in increasing the dilation of the terminal part, which dilation, as has already been indicated, seems to be especially great in Spinax. The 31. extensor is almost as in Acanthias, that is, not sharply bounded from the dorsal part of the 31. dilatator. This latter, on the contrary, is on the ventral side distinctly bounded from the 31. adductor by a line running obliquely from the lateral side down towards the medial side. Its aponeurosis, as in Acanthias, is especially attached to Td and Tv. The glandular bag (the 31. compressor) does not in any of my numerous specimens reach quite to the pelvis, and accordingly it must be termed proportionally small. Its < outer lip-muscle as usual originates from the piece ft and the hindmost rays, and is with its principal portion very distinctly inserted on the piece Tv 2 , with another portion on the folded part of the ventral marginal cartilage (not on the thorn T 3 ). Scymnus lichia Bonap. A skeleton in the Zoological Museum (from V. Fric in Prague). In this specimen the appendix only reaches a trifle farther backward than the fin-membrane, and the condition of the terminal skeleton makes it probable that the organ is not fully developed. < ix THE APPEXDICES GEXITALES (CLASPERS) IX THE SELACHIANS. Between the basale and the appendix-stem is found one piece b z bearing the two hindmost ravs. The piece /? is rather large, flattened, with an edge turned towards the dorsal side. The appendix-stem is as long as B ->- ^; its proximal part below the knee is somewhat bent, medially convex, otherwise of a similar form as in the Greenland Shark, i.e. distally lanceolate; the end-style is very short. The dorsal marginal cartilage is a very narrow ridge, reaching forward almost to /?; the ventral one is much longer than in the Greenland Shark, occupying almost the whole length of the appendix-stem as a rather high, firm, and hard lamella, the distal part of which forms a but small, very narrow, folded plate, properly speaking only an indication of such a one. Among the terminal pieces the piece Td is still quite soft, not separated from the other tissue; Tv on the contrary is hard, and reminds, as to its form, of the corresponding piece in the Greenland Shark. T 3 is present, but small, and no doubt not yet quite formed; whether in the developed organ it is hidden by the soft tissue - so that the observation by Miiller & Henle: Die maunlichen Anhange ohne Stachel (I.e. p. 91) so far may be justified -- I must leave undecided; the observations of these authors concerning the ventral appendages are however, as it turns out, often quite unreliable. Scylliidce. Scyllium canicula (L.). (PL II. fig. 16, 171. The copulatory organs are mentioned by several authors, generally, however, without any par- ticular description, as these authors especially attach importance to one peculiarity in the ventrals of the male, which (in all stages) forms an easy distinctive mark between Scyllium canicula and Sc. stellate (catulus) 1 ), viz. that the ventrals are completely coalesced dorsally of the appendages, and in the middle of the hindmost edge of this coalesced part only a small incision is found. Bv a fold of the fin-membrane, passing over the proximal part of the appendages, these are also partially covered on both sides ventrally, and thus they are placed as tongues in a bell, which is open on the lower side, their hindmost ends reaching to or even farther (abt. 5""") than the hindmost edge of the bell 2 ). The whole dorsal side (i.e. the side towards the body) of the coalesced ventrals is covered with dermal teeth and pigmented (spotted like the skin of the animal in other places), and this cover- ing is continued round the edge to the ventral side, where it is quite sharply limited; the other ven- tral part of the coalesced fins (the part in contact with the dorsal side of the appendages) is naked, unpigmented, and soft. The appendix (in two specimens, when measured from the cloaca, abt. 43'™ long, abt. 6 mm broad at the base of the terminal part, which is of a length of abt. 24"' m ) is straight, posteriorly some- ') See for inst. Miiller & Henle, I.e. p. 7, 10. Kroyer, I.e. p. S24. Dumeril, I.e. p. 316, 317. Lilljeborg, I.e. p. 650. Petri, I.e. p. 303. and fig. 6. ■ words of Lilljeborg 1. c. p. 650: The male has small copulatory organs, not reaching to the hindmost points of the ventrals. ami scarcely of half of the above given length of these fins ■ do not apply to the developed state. Xeither can the figure 6 of Petri represent the developed appendages, and it is upon the whole bad; the appendages are in this species never so clumsy; the description at p. 303 is only ill adapted to Sc. canicula, and nut very well to Sc. catulus. ON THE APPENDICES GENITALES (CLASPERS) IN THE SELACHIAN'S. 33 what conically tapering, on the greater part of the surface covered with dermal teeth; only immediately at the cloaca the dorsal side is naked, as is also the outermost point of the appendix, which is soft and papillous; from here a naked, depressed stripe reaches forward on the medial side of the terminal part')- On this part the dermal teeth have another shape than elsewhere on the animal, being longer and more pointed, like small thorns with the points turned towards the base of the appendix; accordinglv the hinder part of this is rough to the feeling wdien rubbed backward, contrary to what is the case elsewhere on the animal. The appendix-slit is covered in the terminal part by a thin, soft membrane arising from the dorsal (inner) lip; when this membrane is thrown back, the furrow is found to be open as usual; but above the terminal part it is only represented by a groove in the skin, not verv deep; the slit, which in the Sharks, hitherto mentioned, is quite open, is in this animal under the dermal furrow by coalescing formed into a tube reaching to the base of the organ near the cloaca, and first here an opening is again found, an oval aperture through which a sound may be brought into the glandular bag. This latter accordingly has two outlets, one at the base of the appendix, the other between the movable parts of the terminal part 2 ). The skeleton. Between the basale and the appendix is found one very small piece (<^) bearing 110 rays; the piece [i is also inconspicuous, somewhat triangular, with a broad articulation before with the basale, a narrow one behind with the appendix-stem. The appendix-stem is of about the same length as the basale; it is calcified to a rather considerable degree; the soft end-style reaches to somewhat more than half the length of the terminal part. Both marginal cartilages are specially strongly and peculiarly developed, which will be seen from fig. 16 clearer than from a description. The dorsal one (Rd) reaches (as is usual) somewhat further forward than the ventral one, but in the dorsal middle line it joins with the latter for a long way by a firm <■ suture , so that the two cartilages together with the stem form a complete, firm tube, open before where the glandular bag joins it, and behind at the terminal part. Thus the part of the ventral marginal cartilage assisting in the forming of this tube, corresponds to the folded plate of the ventral marginal cartilage in the before mentioned Sharks 3). The number of terminal pieces is four^), completely corresponding to those in Acanthias. Td is narrow, somewhat triangular; along the side towards the furrow it is connected with a thin, style-shaped piece, Td 2 which proximally becomes broader, and reaches a little under the dorsal mar- einal cartilaee. Tv is broader, lenglheiied-oval, rounded on the outer side, towards the furrow slightly hollow, thick, and solid. Between its proximal end and the ventral marginal cartilage is inserted a well developed piece, T 3 , which is not formed as a thorn, nor can it be erected to such a position, as ') At x in the fig. 6 of Petri. 2 Daw, J.: On the Male Organs of some Cartilaginous Fishes, Phil. Tr. vol. 10, 1839, p. 146, has already mentioned this fact in Scyllium Edwardsii\ Petri represents it 1. c. p. 304. 1 As Petri has not seen the marginal cartilages as such in Acanthias, he has in Scyllium understood them to be something particular in this genus. 11 When Petri also finds four pieces in Scyllium it arises from his counting the end-style of the stem (b'" fig. 7, C); he has really overlooked one piece, viz. Td 2 . The Ingolf-Expedition. II. 2. 5 34 ON THE APPENDICES GENITALES (CLASPERS) IN THE SELACHIANS. the corresponding piece in the hitherto mentioned Sharks. All these terminal pieces are hard, white, china-like, tmt none of them protrudes with any part through the skin. The muscular system is as in Sc. stellare, where it will be more particularly mentioned. Scy Ilium stellar e (L) i PL II, fig. 1S-19; pi. VI, fig. 65— 66.1 As upon the whole the ventrals of the male as to contour and shape are different from those in the preceding species, so it is also the case with the appendices. The ventrals are also here coa- lesced 1 ), but only for a short way (in one specimen of the total length of 90='" the ah / coalesced part has a length of i6 mra ); the r~' '"\ small cut in the posterior edge in Sc. if f^v canicula has here become a large slit [ (in the specimen mentioned above about A 26"™); the dermal teeth also spread to a f '"' W JJr greater extent on the ventral side of this A w l part of the fin. As furthermore 110 lateral F Mm •■ Ai fold of the skin is found on the ventral f J . y'' side covering the base of the appendices, and correspoudina: to the one mentioned in Fig. 7. Fig. 8. Sc. cannula, no shells is formed here. Fig. 7. Scy Ilium stellar e. The appendage of the right side seen T j 1£ a pp e ndix reaches just outside from the ventral side; about the natural size, ad abdominal pore. F fin-membrane, / winglike process. the posterior fin edge; it is far more big Fig. 8. The same appendage seen from the dorsal side- the coa- ^ du ^^ ^ ^ calllal!a , but still lesced part of the membrane of the ventral is cut up, and thrown back. The arrow indicates the direction, in which a sound may be the details remind of the latter, they are brought into the appendix-canal. , , only coarser and more conspicuous. In a specimen of a total length of 90°'" the following measures were found: Length of the appendix from the fore-edge of the cloaca to the hindmost point . 6i mm - - free part 3 6 " ,m - - terminal part 34 mm Breadth of the appendix above the terminal part i4 mm across - - i6 mm The terminal part is relatively larger than in the preceding species, and its peculiar appearance is especially caused by the strongly developed process /, which is only indicated in the preceding species. This process is on the ventral side (fig. 7) hollow , and the bottom of this hollow is naked, which nakedness continues on the soft, outermost point. The greater part of the appendix is also M When Lilljeborg 1. c. p. 655 tells that the ventrals in Sc. sicllare are not coalesced, he is not quite right. Miiller & Henlc I.e. p. 10 state the fact correctly. ON THE APPENDICES GENITALES (CLASPERS) IN THE SELACHIANS. 35 here covered with dermal teeth ; besides the parts mentioned only the surroundings of the anterior aperture of the glandular bag are naked. The points of the dermal teeth are also turned towards the base of the appendix; they are longest and most pointed on the dorsal side of / and /. The appendix- slit is closed (to an extent of abt. 1$™°) in advance of the terminal part, as may be seen by throwing back the dermal lip x — x' in fig. 8; accordingly we have as in Sc.canicula two outlets for the secretion of the glandular bag. The skeleton in its main features is as in Sc. canicula, but the appendix-part of it is much more clumsy and peculiarly twisted. One small b Y without rays, and a little t 3 with rounded contour are found '|. The appendix-stem, from the articulation with b 1 to the end of the style, is of the same length as the basale; it is somewhat bent with medial concavity; the end-style of about half the length of the calcified stempiece; at the distal end of the former the medial edges of both the adjoining ter- minal pieces form a rather sharp knee. The marginal cartilages are principally like those in Sc. canicula; Rd is posteriorly somewhat longer than Rv, and is distally and medially a little hollow. The terminal pieces are four, three of them white and hard. Td is formed somewhat like a roof and as broad medially as Tv is ventrally; Td 2 is mainly as in canicula\ Tv is rounded on the outer side, somewhat concave towards the slit, T~ in my specimen is not calcified; but a soft, fibrous cartilage, joining with Tv and placed in the lip /, in my opinion represents this piece 2 ). As in Sc. canicula none of the terminal pieces are seen through the skin. The muscular system. From the medial marginal part of the M. adductor have been branched off two separate muscles : fig. 65, fig. 66 a s and a 2 . If we look at the ventral side (fig. 65) the fibres of the marginal part are seen as a powerful muscle a It anteriorly originating from the medial aponeurotic stripe, and posteriorly inserted on the proximal part of the appendix-stem close to the ventro-lateral edge of the skeletal orifice for the glandular bag; but part of its fibres attaches to the basale, and another part runs into the M. dilatator. Looking at the dorsal side (fig. 66) we find the edge formed by another muscle a 2 , anteriorly only indistinctly separated from a z , but posteriorly distinctly enough, as here a foremost portion of the J/, dilatator originating from the medial side of the basale, wedges in between both. This muscle a 2 distallv joins with the M. extensor (E), and together with this is inserted by a tendon below the knee of the appendix-stem. The M. dilatator is enormously thick, and originates with the greater part of its mass from the appendix-stem until the boundary of the marginal cartilages, but, as already mentioned, a portion of it arises from the medial side of the basale; part of this muscle distally joins in the composition of the peculiar process f (it is the same in Sc. canicula, where this process is much less conspicuous), which by no means, as Petri says, is composed exclusively of verfilztem Bindegewebe>. ') Petri 1. c. fig. 7 C has distally of fl (r in Petri) another little piece (r"), which is not found at all in my specimen, and which upon the whole I do not think to be normal (originating from a rupture?); furthermore a piece [mr) which he (p. 3051 compares to a knee-cap »; this is, however, scarcely to be regarded as a particular piece, but, I suppose, only a strongly calcified eminence on the stem. 2 ) Petri, fig. 7 C, x. 36 ON THE APPENDICES GENITALES (CLASPERS) IN THE SELACHIANS. M. compressor. The bag-formed part of this muscle is rather long, and reaches considerably forward of the pelvis. On the contrary, the part forming the outer lip-muscle is rather small (smaller than in my figures); as usual it originates from the stem-skeleton (/?) and from the hindmost ravs, and is inserted on the proximal edge of the ventral marginal cartilage; it will here scarcely be able directly to contract the dilated terminal part 1 )- Pristiurus melanostomus (Bonap.). (PI. II, fig. 20, 21.) The ventrals of the male of this species are also dorsally coalesced in a similar manner as in the preceding two Scylliidse 2 ), but to a still less extent than in ^SV. stellare, and a deep curve separates the coalesced part into two fin-laps. The appendices reach far behind the fin- membrane 3), in a specimen of the length of 78 cm to 23™'" behind the point of the fin-membrane; the whole length, from the hindmost edge of the cloaca, is 50 mm ; the part quite free of the fin is 35 mm long; the largest breadth of the organ is about 7'"'"; the terminal part has a length of about 25""". The ventral side is covered with dermal teeth, except the hindmost, soft, as it were, convoluted part (abt. o, mm long), on which still scattered groups of teeth may be seen; the dorsal side is naked, as are also the adjoining parts of the medial side, where they are covered by the fin- membrane; on the free edge of the lip / a few scattered rows of dermal teeth are seen. The dermal teeth are generally very fine; as in the fore- going species their points are on the terminal part turned towards the base of the appendix. The dentition on the coalesced fin-parts is as in Sc. stellar e. The peculiar appearance of the appendix will be seen with sufficient distinctness from fig. 9. The furrow anteriorly is opened by a large, easily distended slit of a length of 8 — io mm ; behind this slit it is closed for an equal length, and again open in the terminal part. In spite of the great dissimilarity in general when compared with the appendix of the preceding Scylliidse, a closer examination will show a rather considerable similarity with these, especially with Sc. stellar e\ corresponding to the peculiar process / of the Scyllia is found a thin, soft dermal process, which may be folded towards the furrow (as in fig. 9), or spread in a wing-like ■1 This part of the M. compressor has been quite overlooked by Petri, who has seen and drawn the other muscles, and given them the following names (see I.e. pi. XVII, fig. 7. A and B|: The muscle here marked ./ (the chief portion of the .1/ adductor) — ft.m.p. i.e. flexor major pinna. — - — a.1 = fl.p.b. i.e. flexor pterygopodii biceps. — - — a 2 = fl.p.ex i. e. flexor plcrygopodii exterior. The M. extensor here marked E =■ ft. p. i. i. e. flexor pterygopodii interior. What Petri calls flexion must, I think, rather be regarded as an adduction connected with an extension of the appendix. -) The expression used by Lilljeborg I.e. p. 66o their inner edges are not coalesced) is accordingly not quite correct. Tin- appendices are shortly described at p. 662. 1) Comp. Gunnerus: Om Haae-Gaelen, pi. I, f. (Trondhjemske Selsk. Skr., II.) Fig. 9. Pristiurus melauostomus. The right appendage seen from the dorsal side; about the natural size. The fin- membrane is cut through, and thrown back. the larger basal opening of the appendix-slit; between the asterisks it is closed by coalescing. The other signs as in fig. 8. ON THE APPENDICE.S GENITALIAS (CLASPERSl IN THE SELACHIANS. 37 shape to the medial side; to the lip / which in the Scyllia is turned into the furrow, corresponds the part in Pristiurus marked with the same letter, to the naked dermal fold i in one corresponds the naked dermal fold i in the other, etc. Also the skeleton shows the near relation to the other Scylliidse. Between the basale and the appendix is found (ventrally) a very small, quite rudimentary piece b l which of course bears no rav; dorsally is found an also very small piece t j. The appendix-stem and the marginal cartilages are much like those in the Scyllia. The stem is twisted longitudinally in a similar manner as in Sr. stellare, but is not bent medially. The dorsal connection of the marginal cartilages, however, is not so close as in the Scyllia; the two pieces may here be forced a little from each other. The number of terminal pieces is five, if to the terminal pieces we will count a piece, Rd 2 , which has not been found in any of the Sharks, mentioned in the foregoing; it is joined movably to the hindmost edge of the dorsal marginal cartilage, and is situated in the dermal fold below the asterisk in fig. 9. Td and To are long and narrow, and form at the end of the style a similar kueeshaped curve as in Scyllium stellar,: (in Sc. canicula it is only indicated); a slightly calcified or almost quite soft piece Td 2 is found, projecting forward under the edge of Rd; To proximally forms a rather broad plate, to the dorsal edge of which is attached a leaf-shaped, somewhat bent piece T v All the pieces are completely hidden in the skin. The muscular system is substantially quite the same as in the Scyllia, the only difference being that the « outer lip-muscle seems to be still less developed in Pristiurus. La inn idee. Lamna cornubica (Gmelin). 1 PI. II, fig. 22, 23.) In a specimen of the length of 2 m 5 c,n , which in the beginning of November 1897 was driven on shore on the western coast of Jutland, the appendix has a length of 2i cmI ) and a largest breadth of 4 cm ; the terminal part is 7,5 cm long. The whole ventral surface is densely covered with dermal teeth quite to the end; this investment ceases with a strongly marked boundary line on the medial surface, which is quite naked to the terminal part; this latter being almost quite covered with teeth until the margins of the appendix-slit, also on the dorsal side; the other parts of the flat dorsal side of the shaft are naked, and these naked parts are laterally marked off from those covered with teeth' by a rather deep longitudinal dermal fold. Apparently the appendix-slit from before the terminal part and to a larger foremost opening at the base of the appendix is closed as in the Scylliidi It ma\ possibly he this (?) slit, which is mentioned by Blainville 1. c. p. 126 as a